Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:43, 19 August 2024

Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons

Draft:Paul Timings deleted

Can you please refer to the language that is non-neutral in the article. Can you please refer to the text that is promotional. Multiple independent reliable, published sources have been provided to demonstrate neutrality and notability. Thanks ~~~~Batesmound Batesmound (talk) 07:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

• Replied on user talk page, no proper refs and opinions rather than facts Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Pawan Khera

Hi . Can you please explain, why the page Pawan Khera got deleted !Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 07:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy, even after it was cleaned up by User:Njd-de it was still pretty promotional Khera is known for his feirce style of debating on news channels... a social media favourite Slayer of opponents in live debates. and the nine (originally 11) supposed refs for a single paragraph are just link spam for sources interviewing or quoting him Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy reping Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

HI . I fail to find any promotional content in what was written in the article . And what was written in the article was supported by proper citations . Lets not link his TV or Social Media image to this independent wikipedia article . Please help in restoring the article and let me now what all needs to improved in it . Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 04:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy You haven't edited the article under your current user name, I'm surprised you know its contents. Do you have any connection with the now-blocked main editor? The italicised text above is from the article, not social media, I'm surprised that you consider it neutral and factual. And the "references", as I've said, are link spam and are just quoting him instead of being independent third-party sources. It won't be restored, and I;m still unclear what your interest in this article is Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I think there is some confusion somewhere . I have created the article yesterday with my username Hellohappy . And I had no idea that it was created and deleted before . I am replying here only on the basis of your reply to my messages . Lets just discuss the article created by me yesterday and not to the one which was created and deleted before . I reiterate that I have no interest in the person not do I endorse what is there in the sources . The person is purely a subject of curiosity for me like the many other biographical articles I have written before in other wikipedias . Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 05:42, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy OK, the link you gave me at the top of this topic was to Pawan Khera, which you have never edited, but it appears that you actually mean Pawan khera a presumably mis-capitalised title you created yesterday. I'll have look in a bit Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

You are right there . Please restore it with only justified and neutral content . Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy unfortunately, that page wasn't deleted because of promotional content, but because it was a copyright violation of this page. We can't host copyright material Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you please, pin point exactly what was the violation in the article ! We can remove those and keep rest, which are no violation . Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

User:Hellohappy done, now restored at Draft:Pawan Khera Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Thaks buddy. Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 03:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of the article John Ebnezar

It appears that your deletion of the article was in undue haste. I had explained on the talk page of the article (after the deletion tag has been put) that the subject of the article was eminently notable per WP:ANYBIO and that I would try to improve the article which I have been trying to carry out for the past one hour or more. I trust that my Wiki profile and my efforts here will convince you that I am not a careless or paid editor. It is sad that you found a person who has been recognized by a country of 1.4 billion people with three of its major awards does not deserve an article in Misplaced Pages.--jojo@nthony (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

jojo@nthony I'll restore it, but give me a couple of hours to remove the obvious errors in referencing and external links before you start on it again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

OK, jojo@nthony I made these edits, I don't think there's anything particularly controversial there, but let me know if you have any queries Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Mate, it was indeed a nice job. I will check if I can find any further information, supported by reliable sources, I will add them. Thanks jojo@nthony (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Another one

Hello, I believe I've found another Samuel Claesson sockpuppet, TheFiberConsumer. Almost every single article they've edited has been edited by at least one Claesson sockpuppet in the past and they've recently recreated the page Samuel Claesson. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

AllTheUsernamesAreInUse thanks, checked and indeffed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Gabriel Grosclaude - Copyright

Hi @Jimfbleak, thank you for taking the time to review my entry submission for Gabriel Grosclaude. I indeed used the information on swissfilms.ch as basis for my entry, but added a couple of more information and added sources. Can I rewrite my entry to differentiate it from the swissfilms.ch page? Thank you for your time. Anotherwaytod (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Replied on user talk page, COI disclosure request Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @Jimfbleak for your extensive and detailed answer on my talk page. Very much appreciated. My biography about Gabriel Grosclaude complied with listed points: independent verifiable sources (Variety, Hollywood Reporter, ScreenDaily), non-promotional tone, no url links in the article... The short biography was indeed based on already written online text (swissfilms.ch), but with added details. Concerning the nature of my relationship to the subject (COI Issue), Gabriel Grosclaude is a relative of mine. Since he just won the "Best Swiss Newcomer" award at the 77th Locarno Film Festival and got some media coverage, I wanted to use this opportunity to add an article on Misplaced Pages since he now meets Misplaced Pages's guidelines for notability. His name is already mentioned in this Misplaced Pages article: 77th Locarno Film Fesitval. Anotherwaytod (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Maffian

Why was Draft:Maffian deleted when it was submitted for review. If it was written as advert, the best option wasn't it to be rejected and tagged as advert so that it can be worked on? Why delete it why still a draft. BigSteeze (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

BigSteeze, in this case, if you take out the obvious promo, what's left is basically "this is an EP from a non-notable (no Misplaced Pages article) musician". Your sources include sites that are not independent verifiable sources, like Spotify and Bellanaija. You also make several claims that your refs don't confirm anyway, such as "received favourable reviews from critics, and topped charts In UK, US, Netherlands". Why isn't the Apple chart sourced to Apple? My judgement was that if this song is notable, it needs rewriting from scratch. Also, if you have a conflict of interest, you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak There are album articles been written without the artist been on Misplaced Pages like King of the Wolves by Alpha P, which is not an artist on Misplaced Pages. Maffian EP did debut on US, UK and other countries here which I didn't remember to add the source. Now you shouldn't have deleted the page since it's still a draft and submitted for review, you should have declined it at least and point out the issue so that I could work on it. There is no COI, I'm only working on the article because I think it's notable. BigSteeze (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

BigSteeze The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x?. Also I think it's notable isn't the same as our music notability criteria. If you think that you can write something that demonstrates why it meets those criteria, with proper refs for all the claims, I'll sandbox the text for you, just let me know Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak You should have declined it, not delete a draft. BigSteeze (talk) 14:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak If sandbox is the option. I will like continue working on it. I believe that the article is notable. BigSteeze (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

BigSteeze now at User:BigSteeze/Maffian Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

About deleting Ertugrul of Ulukayin Topic

Hi Jim I just got a message that says the topic I created is deleted because I'm not neutral. The game I writed topic about has huge fanbase because it is settled on Diriliş:Ertuğrul TV series. It is most popular TV show in Türkiye and also popular in other countries. And if you readed topic you can see I'm absolutely neutral. I didn't say anything good or bad about game. So I want from you to think about your decision and undo the deletion process, thanks in advance. Altugturkcu (talk) 13:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Altugturkcu, i've seen this message and I'll reply tomorrow Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Replied now on user talk page, promo with little evidence of notability Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

About deleting my draft World on the Brink article

Hi Jimfbleak,

When I submitted my draft for the book World on the Brink, I was assured that if it was not up to standards, I would receive constructive criticism on how to improve it. Instead, you deleted it, saying it is "just a book review." You may also recall that I originally posted a longer draft article, which you deleted because you thought I have a conflict of interest (I don't). I submitted the shorter version in order to remove anything even approaching an opinion about the book.

I would like to respectfully ask you how I should approach summarizing a book that I read and liked, and that is important to U.S. foreign policy, in such a way that you or others will not delete it. This is my first draft article and I would like to do more, but obviously I don't want them to be deleted. Please teach me.

Thank you, Fractal Figment (talk) 21:39, 18 August 2024 (UTC)