| Revision as of 04:09, 13 April 2007 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,200 edits Archimedes Plutonium: COI issue← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:29, 19 April 2007 edit undoPastordavid (talk | contribs)10,302 edits LutheranismNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| :(c) Any other ideas? | :(c) Any other ideas? | ||
| We could try to negotiate with AP to get him to abstain from editing the article, but the sourcing is so flimsy right now it's hard to argue that it's a good article. (Plus, except for you and one or two others, it doesn't seem that much energy is being put into improving it). If there's no simple remedy, the COI noticeboard may decide to close the issue and ask people to try ]. ] 04:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | We could try to negotiate with AP to get him to abstain from editing the article, but the sourcing is so flimsy right now it's hard to argue that it's a good article. (Plus, except for you and one or two others, it doesn't seem that much energy is being put into improving it). If there's no simple remedy, the COI noticeboard may decide to close the issue and ask people to try ]. ] 04:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Lutheranism == | |||
| The WikiProject Lutheranism ] is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{tl|Lutheran COTM}}. -- ] 19:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:29, 19 April 2007
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
Archives
Cataloging, Citing, ... 1
Dogs 1
Misc 1
Religion-Faith-Dialog-... 1
Science 1
Sockpuppets, Trolls, Harassment, ... 1
Lost week
Tail end of some issues, never got back about the murder things. Check out WP:TW I think you might like it SatuSuro 02:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
ASIN to OCLC
I noticed this edit on my watchlist. Thank you very much for your work, in almost all cases we probably never should have used an ASIN so I'm glad that someone is switching these out. --Gmaxwell 22:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- You are most welcome! Some editors will probably also be annoyed. I'm finding that I do need to leave ASINs for AV material, such as here. Keesiewonder 22:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Fact template
Hi, {{Fact}} needs a date= parameter. Was that what you meant? Rich Farmbrough, 23:04 30 March 2007 (GMT).
- Sorted (for that article). Special behaviour of infobox. Rich Farmbrough, 10:57 1 April 2007 (GMT).
Doug Skinner
I've edited the entry but wanted you to have a look over it before I remove the various tags. (Emperor 20:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
- OK cool. Tags have been removed. (Emperor 00:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC))
Science Collaboration of the Month
|
You voted for
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Misplaced Pages science article. |
NCurse work 19:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Open solicitation for input/advice
Hello! There's been some recent activity getting the ball rolling at WikiProject Journalism, and if you'd like to join us, I'm sure your input would be valued. In particular, User:Wiki Wistah has proposed a guideline for editing articles about newspapers, and although I've responded with comments of my own, WW rightly suggested that it should be more than just a two-way conversation. I've noticed some of your own edits on related matters and thought you might be interested. Any suggestions would certainly be appreciated. Otherwise, if this is not of interest to you, or if you've already got a plateful of editing, feel free to ignore this message! -Tobogganoggin 01:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I appologise.
I didn't notice. Thank you for showing me. MichaelJE2 22:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
RE:Right behind you...
Thanks, seeing this on my talk page probably gave me a jump start on you though. Stardust8212 23:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Archimedes Plutonium: COI issue
Hi Keesie. Do you have an idea of what to do with this article? Postings on the COI board sometimes linger because no-one can figure out what to do with them. I see that you tried to improve the sources of this article. The editor is misbehaving, but not outrageously. There may be a couple of options:
- (a) Push back against the weak sourcing of the article. *Literal* application of WP:EL and other standards might cause the sources to be decimated, which would lead to removal of some of the content which could no longer be referenced. (Note that The Dartmouth's web site isn't working at the moment, and the newsgroup links don't open for me). I accept the verdict of the AfD that he is notable enough for Misplaced Pages. Trawling through Google might bring up some better material (but I imagine you've tried that already). Usenet postings not by AP himself probably can't be used as a factual reference about him.
- (b) Ask for a user conduct RFC on AP himself.
- (c) Any other ideas?
We could try to negotiate with AP to get him to abstain from editing the article, but the sourcing is so flimsy right now it's hard to argue that it's a good article. (Plus, except for you and one or two others, it doesn't seem that much energy is being put into improving it). If there's no simple remedy, the COI noticeboard may decide to close the issue and ask people to try dispute resolution. EdJohnston 04:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Lutheranism
The WikiProject Lutheranism Collaboration Project is under way. Please help improve this month's article, or make a suggestion for next month's article. To add the collaboration banner to your userpage or talk page, use {{Lutheran COTM}}. -- Pastordavid 19:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)