| Revision as of 04:26, 18 April 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Tawker/Apr07← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:18, 20 April 2007 edit undoDon't lose that number (talk | contribs)652 edits →Thank youNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Thank you for semi protecting my user page. Although the vandalism was funny, it was getting a bit old. Thank you again. ] 17:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | Thank you for semi protecting my user page. Although the vandalism was funny, it was getting a bit old. Thank you again. ] 17:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Request for admin review== | |||
| Hello Tawker, I am asking you to get involved in a controversy. I believe that SlimVirgin violated policy by blocking ] with whom she was involved in a content dispute. It looks like she blocked others (including me) for similar reasons. In my case she unblocked me, but the other blocks remain. This became the subject of an RfC which was deleted by Jayjg. | |||
| However, SlimVirgin posted on my talk page that I could choose an admin to review her actions (see ].) I hope you are willing to do it. It seems like a lot of other admins observe a ]. --] 01:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:18, 20 April 2007
 | Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material
Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007
Master Nan
I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement.
Don't Remove Speedy Tags
Please do not remove speedy tags. If you diasgree with a speedy deletion add {{hangon}} to the top of the page. If you remove it again, I will report to an admin and you will be blocked.
Thank you
Thank you for semi protecting my user page. Although the vandalism was funny, it was getting a bit old. Thank you again. Moorematthews 17:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Request for admin review
Hello Tawker, I am asking you to get involved in a controversy. I believe that SlimVirgin violated policy by blocking User:Tsunami Butler with whom she was involved in a content dispute. It looks like she blocked others (including me) for similar reasons. In my case she unblocked me, but the other blocks remain. This became the subject of an RfC which was deleted by Jayjg. However, SlimVirgin posted on my talk page that I could choose an admin to review her actions (see User_talk:Don't_lose_that_number#TsunamiButler_and_HonourableSchoolboy.) I hope you are willing to do it. It seems like a lot of other admins observe a Code of silence. --Don't lose that number 01:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)