| Revision as of 08:15, 30 August 2024 editDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 edits →{{utrs|90559}}: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:07, 2 September 2024 edit undo1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers198,088 edits Notification: listing of Chondath at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| :{{u|0xDeadbeef}}, is the AFD that caused the sockblock. Penepi was blocked a final time at 14:19 on 31 DEC 23. BRZ8 made his two contributions at 22:50 & 22:56 on the same day shortly after the final indef block. BRZ8 was blocked a couple hours later, by me, after these two contribs. . As I said on Penepi's page; "''Could be a Joe Job, but I'm pretty sure that BRZ8 is a sock of Penepi.''" and nothing has changed my opinion. The evidence isn't "overwhelming", but it consistent with socking, albeit, it is a very limited amount of evidence. After reading the UTRS appeal, I understand why you might want to consider a second chance. Like all second chances, there is a degree of risk, but reblocks are cheap. With that in mind, I wouldn't object to an unblock if you feel the risk is worth it. Consider me neutral, neither supporting nor opposing. There is enough question about the connection, and the person does seem sincere about moving forward. Whether they have the discipline to stick to their promises is something only time will tell. ] - ] 08:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | :{{u|0xDeadbeef}}, is the AFD that caused the sockblock. Penepi was blocked a final time at 14:19 on 31 DEC 23. BRZ8 made his two contributions at 22:50 & 22:56 on the same day shortly after the final indef block. BRZ8 was blocked a couple hours later, by me, after these two contribs. . As I said on Penepi's page; "''Could be a Joe Job, but I'm pretty sure that BRZ8 is a sock of Penepi.''" and nothing has changed my opinion. The evidence isn't "overwhelming", but it consistent with socking, albeit, it is a very limited amount of evidence. After reading the UTRS appeal, I understand why you might want to consider a second chance. Like all second chances, there is a degree of risk, but reblocks are cheap. With that in mind, I wouldn't object to an unblock if you feel the risk is worth it. Consider me neutral, neither supporting nor opposing. There is enough question about the connection, and the person does seem sincere about moving forward. Whether they have the discipline to stick to their promises is something only time will tell. ] - ] 08:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2#Chondath}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ]]] 01:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:07, 2 September 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | WIKIBREAK - I'm extending my break beyond my original plans. I may pop in and do a few little things, or make an edit or two as an IP (I try to sign the summary with "-db" most of the time) but mainly staying away. As I approach my 18th anniversary of being an editor (12 of them as admin), I'm debating what level of activity, if any, I want for the future.
Obviously there are tons of new articles that can be written, but the most basic core articles (the stuff that matters for primary and secondary english educational purposes) now exist and have for some time. That was the reason I got involved in 2006, and now editing is more about maintenance, as well as dealing with spam and vandalism. In many ways, Misplaced Pages is a victim of it's own success (including financial), and I'm not convinced it is the best use of my altruistic time anymore. We will see. -db |
UTRS appeal #90559
Any thoughts on their claim that sock account you blocked is not them? Feel free to comment on the request. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- 0xDeadbeef, is the AFD that caused the sockblock. Penepi was blocked a final time at 14:19 on 31 DEC 23. BRZ8 made his two contributions at 22:50 & 22:56 on the same day shortly after the final indef block. BRZ8 was blocked a couple hours later, by me, after these two contribs. . As I said on Penepi's page; "Could be a Joe Job, but I'm pretty sure that BRZ8 is a sock of Penepi." and nothing has changed my opinion. The evidence isn't "overwhelming", but it consistent with socking, albeit, it is a very limited amount of evidence. After reading the UTRS appeal, I understand why you might want to consider a second chance. Like all second chances, there is a degree of risk, but reblocks are cheap. With that in mind, I wouldn't object to an unblock if you feel the risk is worth it. Consider me neutral, neither supporting nor opposing. There is enough question about the connection, and the person does seem sincere about moving forward. Whether they have the discipline to stick to their promises is something only time will tell. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 08:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
"Chondath" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Chondath has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Chondath until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)