Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pepperbeast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:43, 11 September 2024 editTrUtHJan (talk | contribs)80 edits Vandalism in Kannada page: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 14:43, 11 September 2024 edit undoTrUtHJan (talk | contribs)80 edits Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user TirukodimadachengunrurTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
}} }}


== Vandalism in Kannada page == == Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user Tirukodimadachengunrur ==


"Pepperbeast" "Pepperbeast"

Revision as of 14:43, 11 September 2024


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user Tirukodimadachengunrur

"Pepperbeast" If just adding some random source to any piece of information qualifies as "sourced information", then what is the meaning of sourced information. I have gone through those attached references and NOWHERE does it attest this information. I'm very much aware of "Iravatham Mahadevan's" works and it's far from what has been claimed here as his findings. This is pure misinformation added by the user Tirukodimadachengunrur, to impose their biased views on the Misplaced Pages readers. In fact even the writing style does not match with that of the referenced document. It's our responsibility to prevent such acts of vandalism and restore genuine information. I kindly request you to review the sources before restoring it. TrUtHJan (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply Fylindfotberserk In contrast Iravatham Mahadevan talks about Old kannada language's influence on Old Tamil and not vise versa. Here the user Tirukodimadachengunrur has explicitly tried to quote that Kannada follows the structure of Old Tamil which is false. Furthermore this user goes on to add that Kannada retains the words once used in Tamil which is again incorrect. It has been presented in a way that's completely opposite to what has been documented by renowned linguist "Iravatham Mahadevan". In point of fact even the other attached source "the history of kannada" has nothing that supports the claims of the user Tirukodimadachengunrur. IRAVTAHAM MAHAVEDAN's views have been nicely put across under the "History" section of the same Misplaced Pages page where you can see how the renowned linguist explain why he thinks Tamil retains many Kannada words and not vice verse as claimed by a few editors here. TrUtHJan (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)