Revision as of 10:39, 12 September 2024 editBobrayner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,706 edits →Self publicist: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:01, 12 September 2024 edit undoJamJamSvn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,407 edits →Self publicist: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::He's been covered in numerous reliable secondary sources, so notability and RS have been fully established. I don't think there's any case to answer. ] (]) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | ::He's been covered in numerous reliable secondary sources, so notability and RS have been fully established. I don't think there's any case to answer. ] (]) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::Is there some reason why this article was written to present Stevenson's claims at face value, even when reliable sources say he's lying? ] (]) 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC) | :::Is there some reason why this article was written to present Stevenson's claims at face value, even when reliable sources say he's lying? ] (]) 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::Those sources saying he's lying are recent, and as far as I can tell weren't present when I first wrote this article! ] (]) 15:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:01, 12 September 2024
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Self publicist
This page is entirely based on writing by the subject and completely lacks primary sources - delete? Livermore1922 (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's a contradictory claim, as primary sources are usually sources that are written by the subject. Do you mean it completely lacks secondary sources? I made sure that this article is largely based on secondary sources, which is required for pages on Misplaced Pages. I'm confused as to what you mean. JamJamSvn (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- He's been covered in numerous reliable secondary sources, so notability and RS have been fully established. I don't think there's any case to answer. G-13114 (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is there some reason why this article was written to present Stevenson's claims at face value, even when reliable sources say he's lying? bobrayner (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Those sources saying he's lying are recent, and as far as I can tell weren't present when I first wrote this article! JamJamSvn (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Is there some reason why this article was written to present Stevenson's claims at face value, even when reliable sources say he's lying? bobrayner (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- He's been covered in numerous reliable secondary sources, so notability and RS have been fully established. I don't think there's any case to answer. G-13114 (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs in England
- WikiProject England pages
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles