| Revision as of 14:40, 15 September 2024 editCreatorGen (talk | contribs)8 edits →bharwad: ReplyTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App talk reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:56, 15 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Ratnahastin/Archive 3) (botTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| | minthreadstoarchive=1 | | minthreadstoarchive=1 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == September 2024 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 13:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hello @], I have concern regarding 2 pages | |||
| 1. ], here 4 sources are used multiple times, 2nd 3rd and 4th sources aren't even history sources and 1st source is used more than 10 times. And even the author mentions that "no Muslim chronicle mentions about this battle but local ballads do", this page doesn't even have a single reliable source. | |||
| 2. ] same here, 1st source is used more than 30 times!!! Moreover its completely based on a single book, and this page targets Rajputs see ]. | |||
| Please nominate it for deletion ] (]) 15:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == bharwad == | == bharwad == | ||
Revision as of 20:56, 15 September 2024
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Editors can report a malfunctioning user to Misplaced Pages talk:Village stocks.
bharwad
No one in the talk page wants to answer because how can people with anti-racist and biased information agree? CreatorGen (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- @CreatorGen: What exactly are you trying to say? Ratnahastin (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can you tell me how to get all consent? Because there is no response in the talk page CreatorGen (talk) 14:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)