Misplaced Pages

User talk:95.91.249.178: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:59, 22 September 2024 edit95.91.249.178 (talk) Reason for decline: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 20:03, 22 September 2024 edit undo95.91.249.178 (talk) Reason for declineNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
== Reason for decline == == Reason for decline ==


{{unblock|again i need a solid founded adn objective reason for the bann which 4 mods/admins could not provide. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are forced to provide}} ] (]) 19:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC) {{unblock|again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines}} ] (]) 19:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:03, 22 September 2024

September 2024

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

how is it vandalism? it is just a normal request seriously explain how? 95.91.249.178 (talk) 00:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
come on explain how it is unconstructive. Dont just thnak you around. Explain mister 95.91.249.178 (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

regerg

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i made no disruptive edits only good request to make a page better an dpowermod banned with noe xplaination as what evenw as disruptiv

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Find another website (Acroterion i am pretty sure what you wrote is agaisnt the rule civility "Civility is part of Misplaced Pages's code of conduct and one of its five pillars. Stated simply, editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. They should focus on improving the encyclopedia while maintaining a pleasant editing environment by behaving politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates." i hope you will remove this rude remark youself and reflect a admin should not break rules like this). Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nonsense. Find another website is no decline reasond dear Acroterion, stop absusing the box to post your subjective opinion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i did no disruptive editing just requested a better picture in page human penis, and said someone who requestet transgeder penis yes i agree. How it disruptive, no one could explaine and reason for it is becasue it is no disruptive. Also Acroterion as wiki admin yo should try bei objective at least little bit 95.91.249.178 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think you're fortunate the block is only a week. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Learn what a decline reason is Wiki admins " I think you are furtunate the blokc is onl ya week is a opinion not decline reason 331dot, stop abusing the edits.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No reason for bann was given, request were made to mkae wikipedia better and simmilare are to other requests on tlak page for human penis

Decline reason:

Block extended to two weeks. Yamla (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reason for decline

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

95.91.249.178 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

95.91.249.178 (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Category: