| Revision as of 07:12, 23 September 2024 editProKMT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,327 editsm ProKMT moved page Template talk:Neoauthoritarianism in China to Template talk:Neoconservatism in China: Back to the original title when this template was created. First, get enough agreement on the talk page. With the exception of Guotaian at the moment, many support "Neoconservatism" and not "Neoauthoritarianism".← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:15, 23 September 2024 edit undoGuotaian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,525 editsm Guotaian moved page Template talk:Neoconservatism in China to Template talk:Neoauthoritarianism in China over redirectNext edit → |
| (No difference) | |
Revision as of 07:15, 23 September 2024
Title
- Neoconservatism in China
- Neoauthoritarianism in China
There's a 'move' war going on about which of these two is more appropriate for the title. Let's discuss it here.
I prefer "Neoconservatism". The reason is that I can clearly convey to my readers that this is a conservative ideology, and the moderate/liberal-conservatives in Hong Kong or Macau are less authoritarian. Above all, when arranging "Ideologies," if the title is "Neoauthoritarianism," what can simply be shortened to Authoritarian, Cultural, Social, and Ultra should be written as Authoritarian conservatism, Cultural conservatism, Social conservatism and Ultraconservatism. Because unfamiliar readers may not be able to grasp whether "Neoauthoritarianism" is conservative. ProKMT (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)