Misplaced Pages

User talk:BilCat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:27, 27 September 2024 editUtherSRG (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators177,108 edits Linked in article: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 22:37, 27 September 2024 edit undoBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,707 edits Linked in article: ReplyTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 49: Line 49:
:There's a specfic "See also" parameter in that parameter. The other parameters are separate. ] (]) 22:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC) :There's a specfic "See also" parameter in that parameter. The other parameters are separate. ] (]) 22:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
::That doesn't answer my question. Can you point me to any allowance in ] that allows items previously linked in the article to be in the "See also" section? - ] ] 22:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC) ::That doesn't answer my question. Can you point me to any allowance in ] that allows items previously linked in the article to be in the "See also" section? - ] ] 22:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:::The part that says: "This guideline is a part of the English Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though occasional exceptions may apply." For more specifics, you can read ] and the archive. ] (]) 22:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:37, 27 September 2024

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.

Good to see you back

For however long it may be. - ZLEA T\ 01:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not sure how long it'll be either. We'll see. BilCat (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
whichever - it is good to see you here... JarrahTree 01:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Agree with JarrahTree. Welcome, be it a short or long stay. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! BilCat (talk) 01:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes, glad to see you back. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. I've slowed down a little the past couple weeks, but we'll see how it goes for the next few. BilCat (talk) 00:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes! You were one of my Wiki mentors! Glade to see you! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 03:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Sikorsky S-72

If it’s not proper to link the Sikorsky S-72’s emergency extraction system to ejection seat, a brief explanation of the difference on the page would be nice. RickyCourtney (talk) 03:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh this is rather good ...

So nicely put! Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Know-it-all IPs rub me the wrong way. BilCat (talk) 00:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Calendar emojiHappy First Edit Day!
Hi BilCat! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Party popper emoji

Royal Canadian Air Force

Looks like that IP has been blocked. BTW, thanks for the thanks, and welcome back. Hope you can stay.  BC  talk to me 22:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

No problem. I'm still mostly retired, but I'm watchlisting close to a thousand pages. I had nearly 30,000 when I retired last year. BilCat (talk) 09:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Linked in article

Can you show me where it's allowed to have items in a "See also" section that are linked in the article? And if you are going to make reverts, then you should probably take down your retirement banner... - UtherSRG (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

There's a specfic "See also" parameter in that parameter. The other parameters are separate. BilCat (talk) 22:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
That doesn't answer my question. Can you point me to any allowance in WP:SEEALSO that allows items previously linked in the article to be in the "See also" section? - UtherSRG (talk) 22:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
The part that says: "This guideline is a part of the English Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though occasional exceptions may apply." For more specifics, you can read Template talk:Aircontent and the archive. BilCat (talk) 22:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Category: