| Revision as of 22:53, 27 September 2024 editBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,707 edits →Linked in article: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 28 September 2024 edit undoBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,707 edits Never mind- I retired because of crap like thisTag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| Can you show me where it's allowed to have items in a "See also" section that are linked in the article? And if you are going to make reverts, then you should probably take down your retirement banner... - ] ] 22:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | Can you show me where it's allowed to have items in a "See also" section that are linked in the article? And if you are going to make reverts, then you should probably take down your retirement banner... - ] ] 22:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :There's a specfic "See also" parameter in that parameter. The other parameters are separate. ] (]) 22:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::That doesn't answer my question. Can you point me to any allowance in ] that allows items previously linked in the article to be in the "See also" section? - ] ] 22:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::The part that says: "This guideline is a part of the English Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though occasional exceptions may apply." ] is one of those exceptions, as it was originally a footer template. For more specifics, you can read ] and the archive. ] (]) 22:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I read the talk. I see this was raised. I see it was never settled. "Occasional exceptions" need some extenuating circumstances. I see none here. I'm restoring my edit. - ] ] 22:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Don't. It's been done this way for 15 years, and that's a de facto consensus. ] (]) 22:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 28 September 2024
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.Good to see you back
For however long it may be. - ZLEA T\ 01:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm not sure how long it'll be either. We'll see. BilCat (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- whichever - it is good to see you here... JarrahTree 01:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I missed all those poor attempts at insulting me by the sock from down your way. Hilarious. It's nice to know I live free in his head.
BilCat (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I missed all those poor attempts at insulting me by the sock from down your way. Hilarious. It's nice to know I live free in his head.
- Agree with JarrahTree. Welcome, be it a short or long stay. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! BilCat (talk) 01:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, glad to see you back. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've slowed down a little the past couple weeks, but we'll see how it goes for the next few. BilCat (talk) 00:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, glad to see you back. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! BilCat (talk) 01:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- whichever - it is good to see you here... JarrahTree 01:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes! You were one of my Wiki mentors! Glade to see you! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 03:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Sikorsky S-72
If it’s not proper to link the Sikorsky S-72’s emergency extraction system to ejection seat, a brief explanation of the difference on the page would be nice. RickyCourtney (talk) 03:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh this is rather good ...
So nicely put! Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Know-it-all IPs rub me the wrong way. BilCat (talk) 00:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi BilCat! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC) |  |
Royal Canadian Air Force
Looks like that IP has been blocked. BTW, thanks for the thanks, and welcome back. Hope you can stay. BC talk to me 22:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm still mostly retired, but I'm watchlisting close to a thousand pages. I had nearly 30,000 when I retired last year. BilCat (talk) 09:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for anything you can do BilCat! -Fnlayson (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Linked in article
Can you show me where it's allowed to have items in a "See also" section that are linked in the article? And if you are going to make reverts, then you should probably take down your retirement banner... - UtherSRG (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Category: