Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/1970 Bhojpur uprising: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:38, 3 October 2024 editRatnahastin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,705 edits 1970 Bhojpur uprising: rv Admantine123, Not evidence, stop doing revenge editingTag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 04:19, 3 October 2024 edit undoAdamantine123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,939 edits Restored revision 1249021199 by NitinMlk (talk): Let admins decide, seems Dympies followed me here on invitation as both of you are at odds with me due to reverting your edits at Rajput articleTags: Twinkle Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
::::::::So you got in these sources published by scholarly journals. ] (]) 05:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC) ::::::::So you got in these sources published by scholarly journals. ] (]) 05:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::No because you are yet to explain how any of these sources establish WP:GNG. <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 07:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC) :::::::::No because you are yet to explain how any of these sources establish WP:GNG. <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 07:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Passing mentions don't count when it comes to establish notability. ] (]) 03:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Passing mentions don't count when it comes to establish notability. ] (]) 03:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)<small>— '''Note''': An editor has expressed a concern that ] (] • ]) has been ] to this discussion. ( based on our longstanding dispute on ] caste related articles.)</small>
* '''Keep''': Clearly passes ], many reputed media articles, journals available on internet! ] (]) 10:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB Youknowwhoistheman--> * '''Keep''': Clearly passes ], many reputed media articles, journals available on internet! ] (]) 10:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB Youknowwhoistheman-->
*'''Delete''' Seems insignificant to begin with. ] (]) 16:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Seems insignificant to begin with. ] (]) 16:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:19, 3 October 2024

1970 Bhojpur uprising

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

1970 Bhojpur uprising (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of the content has nothing to do with the actual incident which is itself non-notable. The subject as a whole fails WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, and Bihar. Spiderone 16:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Strong keep the nominator should have researched about the subject before nominating this. There are several high quality journals that are strictly written on this topic. Atleast they should have gone through reference section where they could've found following:
Explain how any of these sources establish WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a significant event of the History of Bihar like Bihar movement. The Naxalism in Bihar has been a highly notable subject to write as in the history of Bihar, we have read caste wars happening over the decades between various faction of society for land and political power. This significant subject throws light on the early events sparking the naxalite movement in plains of central Bihar after it first emerged in the neighbouring state of West Bengal. You talk about "passing mention", let me tell there are seperate books written on the movement like some of the journals I have mentioned there. Anyone with fair judgement would have gauged the notability of the article. Admantine123 (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
You were asked to describe how does those cited sources establish WP:GNG. I am not asking why do you believe this subject is important. Ratnahastin (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
What is the definition of Notability according to you? Admantine123 (talk) 03:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
So you got in these sources published by scholarly journals. Admantine123 (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
No because you are yet to explain how any of these sources establish WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
All of these sources give in-depth coverage of the Bhojpur movement. In fact, the article is already well-sourced and detailed. Having said that, the title of the article isn't good. It should be Naxalite movement in Bhojpur because that's how sources describe this movement, e.g. see here. Note that sources also describe it as Bhojpur movement (see here), although that title seems a bit ambiguous to me. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: