| Revision as of 19:54, 12 October 2024 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots670,798 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)Tag: Disambiguation links added← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:55, 16 October 2024 edit undoKathiWarriorDarbar (talk | contribs)53 edits →Kathi people: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| (].) --] (]) 19:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | (].) --] (]) 19:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Kathi people == | |||
| The article is full of error and bias towards specific community. We have successfully challenged many book publishers through the high court and they have made public apology and removed the articles from their books. | |||
| The substantial cost of the legal process was also had to pay by the publishers. In the Olden days, all the princely states including jagirs used to have their own authors and poets who used to praise only their owners and often used to write bias articles about the opponents. Many English writes have taken the references from those books and poems. ] (]) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 16 October 2024
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Gandhara revert
Hello I would like to ask why you reverted my edit on the Gandhara page lead. Me and Sutyarashi had a discussion on the talk page about the lead and I had implemented some of his criticism (unneccessary vocabulary), whilst asking him that if he had any other issues we can discuss further on the talk page which he did not reply to even after multiple hours, so I find your reasoning for reverting needing further explanation as personally 'Reverting to a stable version' is not a valid excuse especially after we had a civil discussion about the lead.
Based off of the WP:Reverting you didnt say what you object to nor considered what can be improved on or partially reverted which was already being discussed on the talk page to avoid an edit war and to follow wikipedias rule of reverting civilly.
Thanks Zenithxxx (talk) 14:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahyavanshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parmar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Bhai
मेरे भाइयों, यह जानना महत्वपूर्ण है कि गुजरात सल्तनत के शासनकाल के दौरान मुस्लिम नेतृत्व में हिंदू बहुसंख्यक थे :) (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- User:कड़वी मुस्कान Please use English on the English Misplaced Pages. If you wish to edit in Hindi, please edit the Hindi Misplaced Pages. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh ok My brothers, it is important to know that during the reign of Gujarat Sultanate Hindus were in majority under Muslim leadership :) can you change the status of Hindus to be majority? (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- User:कड़वी मुस्कान, we both know that to be an obvious fact, but a reliable source is needed. If you could find a reliable source, you could go ahead and make the edit yourself. Check out Misplaced Pages's policy on reliable sources and citing sources to learn more. Chariotrider555 (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh ok My brothers, it is important to know that during the reign of Gujarat Sultanate Hindus were in majority under Muslim leadership :) can you change the status of Hindus to be majority? (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peshawar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hindustani.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nandgaon, Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bannu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Kathi people
The article is full of error and bias towards specific community. We have successfully challenged many book publishers through the high court and they have made public apology and removed the articles from their books. The substantial cost of the legal process was also had to pay by the publishers. In the Olden days, all the princely states including jagirs used to have their own authors and poets who used to praise only their owners and often used to write bias articles about the opponents. Many English writes have taken the references from those books and poems. KathiWarriorDarbar (talk) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)