Revision as of 17:39, 21 October 2024 edit2600:1008:b21e:e17a:8144:1b56:b780:86dc (talk) Fixed typoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:12, 21 October 2024 edit undoDilettante (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,004 edits →Re:Topic ban/WPO: Arbcom noticeNext edit → | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
Hi Homeostasis07, it is with some level of sadness that I come to your talk page under these circumstances. I need to advise you formally that per the rough consensus of editors at ] (), you are topic-banned from discussing Wikipediocracy. As I noted in my close, a reminder that ], which in this case would include the filing of (or participation in) any future ]. Please let me know if any questions. Thanks, ] (]) 04:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | Hi Homeostasis07, it is with some level of sadness that I come to your talk page under these circumstances. I need to advise you formally that per the rough consensus of editors at ] (), you are topic-banned from discussing Wikipediocracy. As I noted in my close, a reminder that ], which in this case would include the filing of (or participation in) any future ]. Please let me know if any questions. Thanks, ] (]) 04:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
I believe you may still contribute to the case. | |||
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the ] and the ] may be of use. | |||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] 19:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:12, 21 October 2024
“ | Just a Marilyn Manson fan, nothing else. | ” |
Archives |
Thanks for the revert!
Hello! Thanks for reverting me here—that was an unintentional edit; I think I was having trouble with my browser's cache—just a couple edits later, I added a Template:who tag, then, in the very next edit, somehow managed to revert myself. Sorry about that!--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- No worries @Jerome Frank Disciple: I figured it was a mistake. Sort of thing that tends to happen when two users are simultaneously expanding the same section of an article. I'll leave you to it for a while, and come back tomorrow. Happy editing! ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh no! It appears we left the article at the same time; either way, all yours!--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
We Are Chaos
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=We_Are_Chaos&diff=prev&oldid=1174674676 Hi why is Gritdaily unreliable? it seems like a perfectly fine source. -FMSky (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @FMSky: It's a long shot in hell right now, with all of this unresolved, but I do plan on making We Are Chaos at least a GA someday. I started work on the article several months before the allegations surfaced, so felt I might as well finish what I started. I doubt Grit Daily would survive a GA review, to be honest, but if you want to re-add it as a source for the album being rock, please feel free to. There are probably higher-profile sources (i.e., used in more articles; the named source having its own Wiki article, etc.) that could be used to support the same content.
- I don't think the Ultimate Guitar source can be used though. There's a policy somewhere saying the AllMusic sidebar can't be used to source genres, so I doubt that UG default page could be used. Happy to be proven wrong though. Hope you're keeping well, and happy editing. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
After the trial
Your deletion of the commercial consequences section in Depp-Heard. It seems to make sense to add a comment to say that their film careers appear to be unaffected as a result of the trial. The data included in the section you deleted covered their film production careers during the filing of the complaints to the present date once year after verdict. Why delete it? HenryRoan (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- One, because a substantial portion of the section was unsourced and irrelevant to the article; it read like WP:Promotion for the forthcoming Aquaman film. That article is about the trial, not Aquaman. Two, because of what I said in the edit-summary. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
I’m always a little shocked when someone actually stands up for me at ANI. I really can’t thank you enough. Dronebogus (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
- No problem @Dronebogus: I don't believe we've ever interacted before, but I randomly browse ANI every once in a while and couldn't help but notice that comment I responded to. I don't know how that whole thing is going to end, but keep your chin up. And don't let anyone goad you in to saying something you'll end up regretting. Otherwise, you'll be fine. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 02:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Terror Train
Long time no see! Would you be willing to look at the article for Terror Train when I finish it?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- Hey MagicatthemovieS, long time no see indeed! Hope you've been keeping well. Sorry about the delay in responding, but January/February is always a stinker for me, editing-wise. Quite busy at work dealing with paperwork from the pre-Christmas rush. But if you schedule this for a Friday or Saturday evening (the only time I can edit most weeks) then I'd be happy to have a look relatively quickly. Otherwise, you'd probably be left waiting until the next weekend. Have quite a few of my own potential GAs waiting in the wings, until a time when I have enough energy to deal with the reviews. Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, couldn't help but notice you tried to nominate Get Your Gunn for FA earlier this week, but didn't finish the set-up procedure. Is that something you're really interested in doing? I think it's definitely FA-quality work, but feel I should warn you now that it's a lot of work. And WP:FAC is arguably the most politicised Misplaced Pages page these days. Although recent reporting has nothing to do with a song he released in 1994, I'd be very much expecting to see all that brought up during the FA review from at least one of the "regulars". I think We Are Chaos is probably the best work I've ever done on Misplaced Pages (except the lead, which I never finished), but I've not had the stomach for even a GA MM-related review, let alone an FA one. I'm envisioning quite a mess if you proceed, to be honest. We could probably talk more candidly about this elsewhere. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I hear you on the MM stuff. I'm not proceeding with that one. I'll let you know when I finish Terror Train and you can look at it at your convenience. Thanks so much! :)MagicatthemovieS (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- I think Terror Train is looking good right about now so I nominated it.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 02:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- I hear you on the MM stuff. I'm not proceeding with that one. I'll let you know when I finish Terror Train and you can look at it at your convenience. Thanks so much! :)MagicatthemovieS (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Re your oppose vote at Sdkb's RFA
Your rationale and followup message, particularly your parting words "compiling now," were enough to convince me that until you returned, I wouldn't have all the information I'd need to cast a vote. It's now been more than two three four days and 109 129 156 support votes (including mine) have been filed since your last edit here. Do you have an idea when you'll be back with an update? City of Silver 23:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your comment at Sdkb's RfA
At Sdkb's RfA you state that you have off-wiki evidence pointing to their participation in meatpuppetry. The Arbitration Committee has not yet received any such evidence from you. Please supply the evidence by email to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org or withdraw your aspersion. firefly ( t · c ) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just stopped by to notify you that despite ArbCom's asking you to remove it, I think (as a crat) there has been plenty of time for you to compile your concerns and send them to ArbCom or substantiate them publicly inside community norms. Therefore I both redacted the comments and struck your vote until such time you reestablish it within community norms or substantiate your claim at an appropriate venue. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of MarilynManson.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MarilynManson.com, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/MarilynManson.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Resident Evil
Hi there. Did you ever recall your work at Jill Valentine before? That was amazing actually. Because of it, it inspires me to work on another Resident Evil chraracter. I hope you can chime in at my FAC soon. Thank you. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 03:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the kind words. Unfortunately, my personal life hasn't been great this year, with two members of my immediate family being tested for terminal illnesses. I've really not been online at all much this year. I promise I'll try to make time for the FAC, because it would be awesome to see it pass! It may take me a couple of weeks to get to it, but FACs usually take 2–3 months anyway. I wish you all the luck in the world with your nomination in the meantime. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- So sorry to hear that. It's totally fine if you can't chime in since family or real life stuffs is more important than Misplaced Pages. Thank you and take care! 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 02:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roxette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dr. Feelgood.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Street Map.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Street Map.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Re:Topic ban/WPO
I don’t like WPO any more than you do, and would probably vote “oppose” on your Tban if I wasn’t a persona non grata at ANI. But even I think the “support” voters, including the ones obviously just trying to protect their own from accountability, make a point: you can’t keep casting aspersions and then saying you can’t provide evidence. You have to email ArbCom if you have legitimate evidence. Dronebogus (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Dronebogus. Public or not, the results of such an investigation will largely be the same and no less public. If you have evidence, you need to email ArbCom as soon as possible before the problem gets any worse. - ZLEA T\ 16:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for your comments. @Dronebogus: There's been some movement, so I'm happy to provide links publicly at the ANI thread. There's quite a lot, but I thought I'd give you a heads up Dronebogus that I uncovered a lot of discussion about you on WPO, including insults. I'm sure you're aware, but would you be willing for me to include those links in my response? It's fine if you don't want to be involved, but figured it only polite to give you an opportunity to object before I post anything. Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 23:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’m fine with it Dronebogus (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Dronebogus, not yet. I was reluctant to post a wall-of-text, so skirted the line between succinct and comprehensive. I'll post links to comments from WP/WPO users later. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- At this point you should actually just take this to ArbCom. You might’ve avoided a topic ban if you had actually provided evidence earlier but given that you did not do that while making numerous serious allegations against other users I’m not surprised it resulted in a Tban. Dronebogus (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry Dronebogus, not yet. I was reluctant to post a wall-of-text, so skirted the line between succinct and comprehensive. I'll post links to comments from WP/WPO users later. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’m fine with it Dronebogus (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you both for your comments. @Dronebogus: There's been some movement, so I'm happy to provide links publicly at the ANI thread. There's quite a lot, but I thought I'd give you a heads up Dronebogus that I uncovered a lot of discussion about you on WPO, including insults. I'm sure you're aware, but would you be willing for me to include those links in my response? It's fine if you don't want to be involved, but figured it only polite to give you an opportunity to object before I post anything. Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 23:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi Homeostasis07, it is with some level of sadness that I come to your talk page under these circumstances. I need to advise you formally that per the rough consensus of editors at ANI (permalink), you are topic-banned from discussing Wikipediocracy. As I noted in my close, a reminder that exemptions exist to topic-bans, which in this case would include the filing of (or participation in) any future request for arbitration. Please let me know if any questions. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I believe you may still contribute to the case. You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Wikipediocracy-related conduct and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.