| Revision as of 17:35, 23 October 2024 editParvatPrakash (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users683 edits →Draftifying Pulaksagar: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:55, 23 October 2024 edit undoSkynxnex (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,829 edits →Draftifying Pulaksagar: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 298: | Line 298: | ||
| Greetings! I noticed some very poor sources on ] that were not related to the subject and seemed more like vandalism. One such example is a source related to ] was added to the page. In my view, I don't think these two subjects are related. Later, the inadequate amount of content on the page made it seem more reasonable to draftify it. However, I believe you must've created the page with an intent to add more information to it. Right now, there's only 2 sentences on the page, so I believe it should be incubated first and that more contributors should be invited to work on it. I could not establish the subject's notability as well, so draftification seemed the most reasonable step to verify the notability as well as prevent vandalism. Please correct me if I'm wrong.] (]) 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | Greetings! I noticed some very poor sources on ] that were not related to the subject and seemed more like vandalism. One such example is a source related to ] was added to the page. In my view, I don't think these two subjects are related. Later, the inadequate amount of content on the page made it seem more reasonable to draftify it. However, I believe you must've created the page with an intent to add more information to it. Right now, there's only 2 sentences on the page, so I believe it should be incubated first and that more contributors should be invited to work on it. I could not establish the subject's notability as well, so draftification seemed the most reasonable step to verify the notability as well as prevent vandalism. Please correct me if I'm wrong.] (]) 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi @], I've moved the article back to the main space since it's quite an old article, per ] (in general, articles that have been in the main space longer than 90 days shouldn't be draftified except by the creator or after a ] discussion). | |||
| :(Another minor note, for articles in draft space, wrap the categories in {{tl|Draft categories}} instead of deleting them.) ] (]) 17:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:55, 23 October 2024
| This is Capankajsmilyo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 15 days  |
 Archives |
Barnstars
|
The Jain Barnstar | |
| For your contribution to the 'Jainism' related articles. --(nimit) |
- Thank you :D-- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 14:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Hi Pankaj, thanks for your contribution to government related projects. You are valuable for Misplaced Pages. Keep it up. Thanks again.-- Human3015 10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC) |
- Thankyou Human3015 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you Pankaj for your fantastic contributions to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Jainism. I have been following your edits and it is heartening to note that you have brought new enthusiasm to 'Jainism' related articles. Your articles on Jain monks and Jain temples are very important. Keep up the great work, looking forward to working with you. Aayush18 (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot Aayush18 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I've seen you a couple of times, and just wanted to thank you for your continuous, helpful contributions. Cheers! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot. Coming from you, this means a lot. :D -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| For your ceaseless efforts at Mahavira, Digambara and Jain monasticism despite the major issues we had to face. I am sure you will learn from these reviews and it will help you write a lot of wonderful articles in the future! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
The Jain Barnstar | |
| For your contribution to the Jainism related articles. --Nizil (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thankyou Nizil Shah -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Misplaced Pages and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian Jain poets by century
A tag has been placed on Category:Indian Jain poets by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 23:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Draftifying Pulaksagar
Greetings! I noticed some very poor sources on Pulaksagar that were not related to the subject and seemed more like vandalism. One such example is a source related to Rakhi Sawant was added to the page. In my view, I don't think these two subjects are related. Later, the inadequate amount of content on the page made it seem more reasonable to draftify it. However, I believe you must've created the page with an intent to add more information to it. Right now, there's only 2 sentences on the page, so I believe it should be incubated first and that more contributors should be invited to work on it. I could not establish the subject's notability as well, so draftification seemed the most reasonable step to verify the notability as well as prevent vandalism. Please correct me if I'm wrong.ParvatPrakash (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @ParvatPrakash, I've moved the article back to the main space since it's quite an old article, per WP:DRAFTNO (in general, articles that have been in the main space longer than 90 days shouldn't be draftified except by the creator or after a WP:AFD discussion).
- (Another minor note, for articles in draft space, wrap the categories in {{Draft categories}} instead of deleting them.) Skynxnex (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)