Talk:Gary Stevenson (economist): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:01, 27 October 2024 editThenightaway (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users51,758 edits →Should not be characterized as an economist: new sectionTag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:12, 27 October 2024 edit undoG-13114 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions27,089 edits →Should not be characterized as an economist: replyNext edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	The first sentence and the title of the article describes the subject as an "economist". While the subject has among other things studied economics (as many people do), the subject is not an academic economist and it's misleading to describe him as such. It's puffery. Reliable sources do not consistently identify the subject as an "economist". The subject is a former financial trader, and YouTuber. ] (]) 21:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)		The first sentence and the title of the article describes the subject as an "economist". While the subject has among other things studied economics (as many people do), the subject is not an academic economist and it's misleading to describe him as such. It's puffery. Reliable sources do not consistently identify the subject as an "economist". The subject is a former financial trader, and YouTuber. ] (]) 21:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
			:The Guardian article gives his qualifications as "] in maths and economics, London School of Economics. ] in economics, Oxford." That makes him pretty well qualified does it not? ] (]) 21:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:12, 27 October 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Self publicist

This page is entirely based on writing by the subject and completely lacks primary sources - delete? Livermore1922 (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

That's a contradictory claim, as primary sources are usually sources that are written by the subject. Do you mean it completely lacks secondary sources? I made sure that this article is largely based on secondary sources, which is required for pages on Misplaced Pages. I'm confused as to what you mean. JamJamSvn (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

He's been covered in numerous reliable secondary sources, so notability and RS have been fully established. I don't think there's any case to answer. G-13114 (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Is there some reason why this article was written to present Stevenson's claims at face value, even when reliable sources say he's lying? bobrayner (talk) 10:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Those sources saying he's lying are recent, and as far as I can tell weren't present when I first wrote this article! JamJamSvn (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Should not be characterized as an economist

The first sentence and the title of the article describes the subject as an "economist". While the subject has among other things studied economics (as many people do), the subject is not an academic economist and it's misleading to describe him as such. It's puffery. Reliable sources do not consistently identify the subject as an "economist". The subject is a former financial trader, and YouTuber. Thenightaway (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

The Guardian article you cited gives his qualifications as "BSc in maths and economics, London School of Economics. MPhil in economics, Oxford." That makes him pretty well qualified does it not? G-13114 (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: