| Revision as of 11:32, 2 November 2024 editSpiderone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers189,800 edits Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:01, 2 November 2024 edit undoDoubleGrazing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators123,752 edits deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' I must say I'm baffled. An earlier attempt was speedied. The author then created this directly in the main space, from where it was draftified. I advised them against trying to create this directly, ''on account of their COI'', and the next thing I find out they've gone ahead and done just that. So apart from anything else, I think the author should give some undertaking not to keep creating this, because otherwise we're just chasing our tails here. I don't think there's much point in draftifying this, as another copy already exists in the draft space; let's just figure out whether the subject is notable, and delete if not. For now, I'm saying delete as non-notable, because there's nothing in the draft as it currently stands that would suggest otherwise. --] (]) 14:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:01, 2 November 2024
International Certification of Dance Studies
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- International Certification of Dance Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested draft, immediately moved back to mainspace by the author. Article clearly needs more work, and should remain in draftspace for the time being. No objections to deletion. CycloneYoris 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and France. CycloneYoris 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I must say I'm baffled. An earlier attempt was speedied. The author then created this directly in the main space, from where it was draftified. I advised them against trying to create this directly, on account of their COI, and the next thing I find out they've gone ahead and done just that. So apart from anything else, I think the author should give some undertaking not to keep creating this, because otherwise we're just chasing our tails here. I don't think there's much point in draftifying this, as another copy already exists in the draft space; let's just figure out whether the subject is notable, and delete if not. For now, I'm saying delete as non-notable, because there's nothing in the draft as it currently stands that would suggest otherwise. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)