Revision as of 02:21, 2 November 2024 editChaotic Enby (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,828 edits →November 2024: reply to Kolano123Tag: CD← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:25, 3 November 2024 edit undoPowerinhand (talk | contribs)46 edits →Jats with Zutt disguised identity: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Please see more information at ]. | Please see more information at ]. | ||
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] ] 00:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] ] 00:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Jats with Zutt disguised identity == | |||
{{Quote|Irrational}} exuberance straightforwardly countering your speculation revision if suppose their any pre existed community identify as Zutt or with any kind of similar prefixation, so in responsive manner its should be interpreted in different article weather they have so much in common or whatever you thinks upon regardless of their similar stature, in this case you are talking about Jats one of the subnormal people widely spreads within the Indian geographical region and pose much more higher tendency than zutt (Non even close in term of demographic) so I eagerly requested you to please remove that exaggerated statement and just wait to get third party opinion for refining the doubt and misunderstanding between both of us thanks alot ] (]) 23:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:25, 3 November 2024
November 2024
Hello DelphiLore. I've changed the redirect to a link, so that your fellow editors can continue posting to your main talk page. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Anthem of Europe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 22:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, blanking and redirecting a well-established page without any explanation or discussion is pretty unacceptable in almost any case I can imagine. Please be more communicative and cautious in the future. Remsense ‥ 论 22:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- DelphiLore, you have now received many repeated warnings about non-constructive editing and copyright issues on your talk page, going as far back as April. You have partly obscured this by twice moving your entire talk page to other names (User talk:DelphiLore/old and User talk:DelphiLore/archive2) without leaving a link to them — despite my warning about this particular bizarre move after the first time () — but this behaviour is still visible to everyone. Any more non-constructive editing would almost certainly justify a report to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- DelphiLore, you're supposed to edit constructively, not destructively. You're also supposed to help users. Kolano123 (talk) 01:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, while I understand you wish to help, this message might read as some kind of piling on, especially since Delphi hasn't edited since the previous warning. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- DelphiLore, you're supposed to edit constructively, not destructively. You're also supposed to help users. Kolano123 (talk) 01:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- DelphiLore, you have now received many repeated warnings about non-constructive editing and copyright issues on your talk page, going as far back as April. You have partly obscured this by twice moving your entire talk page to other names (User talk:DelphiLore/old and User talk:DelphiLore/archive2) without leaving a link to them — despite my warning about this particular bizarre move after the first time () — but this behaviour is still visible to everyone. Any more non-constructive editing would almost certainly justify a report to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Pehchaan The Street School moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Pehchaan The Street School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sam Sailor 00:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Jats with Zutt disguised identity
Irrational
exuberance straightforwardly countering your speculation revision if suppose their any pre existed community identify as Zutt or with any kind of similar prefixation, so in responsive manner its should be interpreted in different article weather they have so much in common or whatever you thinks upon regardless of their similar stature, in this case you are talking about Jats one of the subnormal people widely spreads within the Indian geographical region and pose much more higher tendency than zutt (Non even close in term of demographic) so I eagerly requested you to please remove that exaggerated statement and just wait to get third party opinion for refining the doubt and misunderstanding between both of us thanks alot Powerinhand (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)