Revision as of 19:07, 2 November 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,185 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Joshua Jonathan/Archive 2024) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:56, 7 November 2024 edit undoForistslow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,739 edits →Bodhidharma: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
] | ] | ||
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 16:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 16:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Bodhidharma == | |||
Hello, just wanting an explanation on why jumping straight to Chan on the Bodhidharma page is acceptable given that you seem to have quite a understanding of history. There are two points the word and character is Chinese and not Indian so by reason denotes integration into Chinese culture, and the other is there is a complete neglect to reference the initial Chinese Buddhist's historical culture. The time foundation of south and north is still in dispute. ie hui-neng. I think that we are going to have to get mediation on this one to be fair if you and the others are going to dispute my edit on page. Thankyou ] (]) 00:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:56, 7 November 2024
For convenience: {{mdf|1=]|2=reason, ~~~~}}
Bhagavad gita
Happy to see you more contribution on Bhagavad Gita, however it's sacred text for Vaishnavism and Vishnu devotee. Please add Religious significance of Bhagavad Gita Add sub article text with link.
Here is the link
Gita Mahatyam https://bharatabharati.in/the-myth-of-saint-thomas-and-the-mylapore-shiva-temple-2010-ishwar-sharan/bhagavad-gita-mahatmya/ @Joshua Jonathan Keshava Kumar (talk) 12:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanx
The Upholder of Wiki is awarded to exceptional and distinguished contributors on Misplaced Pages.
If I could I would give you every award Wiki has. You showed up. You have persevered in dealing with me, and your edits are of the highest quality. I hope to be able to count on you in all my future endeavors. (And I love all your quotes on your name page.) Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my, Jenhawk777, custom is to say "Thank you, much appreciated!", but in this case I'd say 'Undeserved, 'cause I was quite harsh on you, and still haven't answered your latest ping'. But, I'm impressed with the humbleness of awarding this barnstar, so, thank you, and I'll try to be of help when needed, but I won't promise it, since I can't be sure if I'll always be able to do so. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:28, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated - and not undeserved. Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
Hey I noticed you reverted my edit on Maurya Empire despite that edit adding official name of Nanda-Mauryan War and removing unnecessary title.I hope you understood.Thanks Edasf (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Bodhidharma
Hello, just wanting an explanation on why jumping straight to Chan on the Bodhidharma page is acceptable given that you seem to have quite a understanding of history. There are two points the word and character is Chinese and not Indian so by reason denotes integration into Chinese culture, and the other is there is a complete neglect to reference the initial Chinese Buddhist's historical culture. The time foundation of south and north is still in dispute. ie hui-neng. I think that we are going to have to get mediation on this one to be fair if you and the others are going to dispute my edit on page. Thankyou Foristslow (talk) 00:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)