Talk:Kamala Harris: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:33, 9 November 2024 view sourceBluseventy2 (talk \| contribs)19 edits →Closing paragraph of “public image” section: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:46, 9 November 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,662 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 6) (botNext edit →
Line 102:		Line 102:
	\| minthreadsleft = 3		\| minthreadsleft = 3
	}}		}}

	== Coconut tree and accent ==

	I fail to see the significance of this content in the article. In fact, I don't even the the point of either paragraph. They seem to be nothing more than standard, insanely shallow political nonsense. ] (]) 23:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

	:@] I think it relates fairly well under 'public image'. Yeah, some of it seems stupid, but I think that weirdly enough, it concerns people enough to have them feel differently about her. Honestly, I see no harm in having it. The article can have the facts and people can form their own opinion of the political weirdness from it. ] (]) 02:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
	::It's just a single opinion piece by a right-leaning talking head ''dismissing'' the idea. If, as you say, it {{tq\|concerns people enough to have them feel differently about her}}, you should be able to find ] non-opinion coverage of it emphasizing its significance to her public image; but right now, the coverage makes it seem more like a single failed barb by Vance that failed to land. For articles on subjects this prominent, we don't cover every single political zinger that fell flat – only ones that got enough traction to have significant secondary coverage. --] (]) 02:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

	== A "consensus" based on an all-too-brief discussion ==		== A "consensus" based on an all-too-brief discussion ==

Revision as of 15:46, 9 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kamala Harris article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 7 days

view · edit Frequently asked questions Q1: Why does Misplaced Pages say that Kamala Harris is African American/Asian American/South Asian American? A1: Misplaced Pages content is based on reliable sources (see Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources). Many reliable sources, over a long period, refer to Harris as African American and Asian American, so Misplaced Pages reflects that in this article. Moreover, Harris's Senate and campaign websites state that she is African American and Asian American. Social media posts have inaccurately suggested that Harris cannot be African American because she has an Indian mother and Jamaican father. As PolitiFact notes, (see A look at Kamala Harris' multi-ethnic background and racial identity in the US, PolitiFact (August 14, 2020)), "this is a poor understanding of history, and ... the implication that Jamaicans aren't African or connected to Africa is wrong on its face." While not all Jamaican-Americans identify as "African American," Harris and many others do. When Misplaced Pages describes someone as the "first" to do something, we default to the larger category. Therefore, while Harris is the first Tamil-American, Indian-American, or South Asian-American to be Vice President of the US, we describe her, as reliable sources do, as the first Asian American to be Vice President of the US.

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

African diaspora Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Black Lives Matter Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Black Lives Matter's July 2020 edit-a-thon.

California: San Francisco Bay Area High‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Montreal Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

United States: Asian Americans / Presidential elections / Presidents / Government High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

University of California Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Black women (2020) / #1day1woman (2021) / #1day1woman (2020)

	This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
	Black women edit-a-thon in February 2020
	#1day1woman initiative in 2021
	#1day1woman initiative in 2020

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your edit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.

The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Other talk page banners

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2019, 2020, and 2021.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 26 times. The weeks in which this happened:

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Aída Chávez (2 July 2020). "There's a War Going on Over Kamala Harris's Misplaced Pages Page, With Unflattering Elements Vanishing". The Intercept. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
Eric Ting (4 July 2020). "Someone is working very hard to dress up Kamala Harris' Misplaced Pages page, report finds". SFGate. Retrieved 4 July 2020.
Tyler Olson (6 July 2020). "Kamala Harris' Misplaced Pages page scrubbed of information amid veepstakes, igniting online fight". Fox News. Retrieved 6 July 2020.
Emily Jacobs (7 July 2020). "Kamala Harris' Misplaced Pages page has been edited over 500 times amid VP rumors". New York Post. Retrieved 7 July 2020.
Zachary Petrizzo (11 August 2020). "Trolls Are Currently Trying to Deface Kamala Harris' Misplaced Pages Page With Slurs and Other False Info". Mediaite. Retrieved 11 August 2020.
Joshua Benton (13 August 2020). "The Misplaced Pages War Over Kamala Harris's Race". The Atlantic. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
Bradley Cortright (24 January 2024). "Harris Complains About How Tall Misplaced Pages Says She Is". Independent Journal Review. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
Johnathan Jones (24 January 2024). "Kamala Harris Bothered by How Tall Misplaced Pages Says She Is: 'That Is Absolutely Incorrect'". The Western Journal. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
Reagan Reese (24 January 2024). "Kamala Harris Is Very Concerned About Misplaced Pages Trolls Making Her Look Short". The Daily Caller. Retrieved 26 January 2024.

Section sizes

Section size for Kamala Harris (39 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	7,355	7,355
Early life and career	230	34,271
Early life and education	16,038	16,038
Early career	2,989	2,989
San Francisco District Attorney (2002–2011)	15,014	15,014
Attorney General of California (2011–2017)	15,177	15,177
U.S. Senator (2017–2021)	33	51,019
Election	8,573	8,573
Tenure and political positions	2,215	39,284
2017	8,634	8,634
2018	8,877	8,877
2019	14,373	14,373
2020	3,982	3,982
2021	1,203	1,203
Committee assignments	2,409	2,409
Caucus memberships	720	720
2020 presidential election	33	21,020
Presidential campaign	13,269	13,269
Vice presidential campaign	7,718	7,718
Vice presidency (2021–present)	5,109	33,570
Senate presidency	8,341	8,341
Immigration	13,878	13,878
Foreign policy	6,242	6,242
2024 presidential election	941	12,956
Presidential campaign	12,015	12,015
Political positions	5,505	17,491
Abortion	3,059	3,059
LGBT rights	4,879	4,879
Criminal justice	4,048	4,048
Personal life	9,846	9,846
Public image	10,494	10,494
Publications	810	810
See also	634	634
Notes	26	26
References	1,269	1,269
Further reading	353	353
External links	201	7,853
Official	286	286
Other	7,366	7,366
Total	224,144	224,144

A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on October 20, 2021 and October 20, 2022.

A "consensus" based on an all-too-brief discussion

user:Antony-22 has interpreted this discussion to establish a consensus for including racial categories such as Afro-Jamaican or dubious ethnic categories such as Indian-American in the lead paragraph of this article. The discussion, in which four editors participated, lasted but two days (October 1 to October 3). The first three respondents (user:Jack Upland, user:JohnAdams1800 and user:Valereee didn't exactly agree with the user:Antony-22's proposal.

On the heels of an exhaustive RfC—which had begun on July 31 and was closed by user:S Marshall on September 26 and in which there was little support for including racial categories of descent—to claim that such a brief and perfunctory discussion constitutes a consensus for revision is a slap in the face of the RfC participants (who had cited dozens of sources). I have therefore undone user:Antony-22's changes in the lead. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

We had an RFC, a discussion had between 4 editors can't overturn that. Slatersteven (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Antony-22's edit should be reverted and not reinstated.—S Marshall T/C 16:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
In agreement with Fowler&fowler's revert, as it maintains the RFC result. GoodDay (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I won't edit the lead again. But I do want to point out that the RfC was specifically about the "Black" vs. "African-American" terminology, and there wasn't discussion there about whether to use "Afro-Jamaican". As I've mentioned, some readers seem to not be aware that Black Jamaicans have ancestors from Africa and aren't fully indigenous, and my intent was just that a link to Afro-Jamaicans somewhere prominent helps our readers learn that if they're not aware of it. Antony–22 (⁄_contribs) 23:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

And African-Americans are none of those? Slatersteven (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Incumbent, until Jan 20, 2025

Please oh please. When we know who Harris' veep successor-to-be is. Let's not change "Incumbent" to "Outgoing", in Harris' infobox. GoodDay (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Good point. Now that Harris has been soundly defeated by Trump in the general presidential election, her successor will be J.D. Vance. TopShelf99 (talk) 14:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

When to accept a winner and loser tonight for this page's lead?

For 178 years, the Associated Press (AP) has been the gold standard for calling the American presidential election. See AP, Le Monde, Guardian, and NPR, which partners with AP to name just a few.

I Propose that we wait until AP makes the call at its Live website That way there won't be any jumping the gun and edit wars in its wake. Please voice support or opposition below.

Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Comment. This should be on the talk page for the election article. It's also extremely unlikely we will know the winner tonight; it could take days to count Pennsylvania where Democrats disproportionately vote by mail. 331dot (talk) 22:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
We follow the procedures for the main 2024 United States presidential election, which will not call a winner until: Update notice Please do not state that a state/an election has been won by a candidate before the election has been called by all of the following networks:ABC, Associated Press, CBS, CNN, NBC. We shouldn’t deviate for other pages Raladic (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Oh, OK, Thanks. So there we have it in Raladic's post above. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

It's over – she lost. TopShelf99 (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

What to write in the lead paragraph should KH win

Obviously moot – Muboshgu (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
I propose that we write: Kamala Devi Harris (English: /ˈkɑːmələ ˈdeɪvi/ , born October 20, 1964) is an American politician and attorney who is the President-elect of the United States. On January 20, 2025, she will be sworn in as the United States' 47th president, its first first female president, and the highest-ranking female official in its history. Harris was the Democratic presidential nominee in the 2024 United States presidential election, which she has won by defeating former president Donald Trump<cite AP here> The remainder of her current lead paragraph should be in later paragraphs. Please discuss below. Of course, if she loses, then this page will not have much traffic. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Should she win we'll probably follow the precedent. The current lede paragraph wouldn't be moved to later, possibly cut down a little, but the information that's currently there would stay. Most of your proposed writing would probably be in the last paragraph, as they are written in chronological order. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Oh, I see. That makes sense. Didn't think of it. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Assuming it goes the other way at this point, I think the first paragraph would be fine as is with the fourth paragraph being updated about the election, similar to John McCain. Alternatively, we could do something similar to Hillary Clinton and say, A member of the Democratic Party, she was the party's nominee in the 2024 presidential election, becoming the most recent woman to win a presidential nomination by a major U.S. political party (following conditional on 2024 results) and the most recent woman to win the popular vote for U.S. president. --Super Goku V (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC) THis is why we have wp:crystal. Slatersteven (talk) 10:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC) References Kamala Harris (May 24, 2016). "People pronounce my name many different ways. Let #KidsForKamala show you how it's done" (Tweet) – via Twitter.

Obviously moot – Muboshgu (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

I propose that we write:

Kamala Devi Harris (English: /ˈkɑːmələ ˈdeɪvi/ , born October 20, 1964) is an American politician and attorney who is the President-elect of the United States. On January 20, 2025, she will be sworn in as the United States' 47th president, its first first female president, and the highest-ranking female official in its history. Harris was the Democratic presidential nominee in the 2024 United States presidential election, which she has won by defeating former president Donald Trump<cite AP here>

The remainder of her current lead paragraph should be in later paragraphs. Please discuss below. Of course, if she loses, then this page will not have much traffic. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Should she win we'll probably follow the precedent. The current lede paragraph wouldn't be moved to later, possibly cut down a little, but the information that's currently there would stay. Most of your proposed writing would probably be in the last paragraph, as they are written in chronological order. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I see. That makes sense. Didn't think of it. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 23:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Assuming it goes the other way at this point, I think the first paragraph would be fine as is with the fourth paragraph being updated about the election, similar to John McCain. Alternatively, we could do something similar to Hillary Clinton and say, A member of the Democratic Party, she was the party's nominee in the 2024 presidential election, becoming the most recent woman to win a presidential nomination by a major U.S. political party (following conditional on 2024 results) and the most recent woman to win the popular vote for U.S. president. --Super Goku V (talk) 09:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

THis is why we have wp:crystal. Slatersteven (talk) 10:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

References

Kamala Harris (May 24, 2016). "People pronounce my name many different ways. Let #KidsForKamala show you how it's done" (Tweet) – via Twitter.

Edit request - revert "Exiting office" in the info box

I request that "Exiting office" and the Jan 20, 2025 date is reverted back to "Assumed office" with the date she was sworn in as VP. "Exiting office" sounds silly, and the info box should have the date she assumed the role, not the date two months from now that she's leaving it. Luminism (talk) 12:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

Resolved --Super Goku V (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

What to write in the lead paragraph now that KH was defeated

Suggested change: Change "Harris lost the general election to her Republican Party opponent Donald Trump" to "Harris was soundly defeated in the 2024 presidential election by her Republican Party opponent, Donald Trump. Harris lost the electoral vote 226-312, and garnered over 4.5 million less popular votes than Trump." TopShelf99 (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Becasue we try to keep it neutral. Slatersteven (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Exactly - What I am suggesting is both factual and neutral. I don't want this article to be completely laudatory about Harris, and I don't want it to be completely defamatory like the Trump article. TopShelf99 (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

So you do not want it to be negative, by saying she "was soundly defeated"?, Sorry that makes no sense, we say totally neutrally she lost. That is all we need to say. Slatersteven (talk) 14:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

She WAS soundly defeated. That is more factual and neutral than referring to Trump lying, racist, misogynistic, and one of the worst Presidents in history, and those terms were all allowed in the lede in the Misplaced Pages article on Trump. I can understand your disappointment about the election results and voters' repudiation of the damage Harris and Biden have caused for four years and what she stands for, but you and your fellow editors and administrators shouldn't let your liberal bias continue to influence Misplaced Pages articles. TopShelf99 (talk) 15:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

This not about Trumps article, it is about here, and we do not engage in tit for tat WP:FALSEBALANCE. Slatersteven (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Please be mindful not to use talk pages as a WP:SOAPBOX. You can disagree, but your personal political opinions are irrelevant to the discussion. That being said, Trump's lede says "Scholars and historians rank Trump one of the worst presidents in history" as that is reflective of the opinions of scholars and historians, at least for his first term. The same is said for James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson. estar8806 (talk) ★ 15:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

What's to re-write? She lost the 2024 election, that's it. GoodDay (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Donald, is that you? In all seriousness, can we please skip to a WP:NOTHERE block? @TopShelf99's contributions since their account creation have largely been reverted or been talk page soap boxing. Certainly not enough to warrant letting them continue. Note also the warnings and discussion on their user talk page. —Locke Cole • t • c 17:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

wp:ani is the place to discus user conduct, not here. Slatersteven (talk) 17:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Closing paragraph of “public image” section

The closing paragraph of the public image section seems either unnecessary or written in a way that talks about Trump more than Harris. While the campaign ad did talk about her, it still seems unnecessary to talk about a campaign ad for Donald Trump under a page that is not his, or to make it the central focus of a paragraph. Bluseventy2 (talk) 04:33, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: