Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rasteem: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:20, 10 November 2024 editRasteem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,736 edits Reverted 2 edits by Dympies (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 10:42, 10 November 2024 edit undoRasteem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,736 edits retaliatory?: ReplyTags: Reverted ReplyNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
==retaliatory?== ==retaliatory?==
Hi, I have noticed you are calling talkpage messages and warnings as retaliatory in spite of the fact that they really are not. warning by NXcrypto was received before you so it is not retaliatory, in fact it can be construed as the opposite. You also removed a talkpage message by me calling it "retaliatory" about misidentifying an academic from your talkpage. Do note that you can remove any talkpage message or warning but I would like to know what made you think that it was retaliatory, thanks. ] (]) 07:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC) Hi, I have noticed you are calling talkpage messages and warnings as retaliatory in spite of the fact that they really are not. warning by NXcrypto was received before you so it is not retaliatory, in fact it can be construed as the opposite. You also removed a talkpage message by me calling it "retaliatory" about misidentifying an academic from your talkpage. Do note that you can remove any talkpage message or warning but I would like to know what made you think that it was retaliatory, thanks. ] (]) 07:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

:You revert my well explained edits , then I reverted your edit with a fully explained edit-summary then gave you an edit warning (At ]) without replying, you removed the warning notice. Then, in retaliation, you gave me an edit warning (at 08:49 but after NXcrypto). I removed this warning per the obvious retaliatory warning and was given in return for this warning I gave you after your attempt of introducing the origin of any particular state at ]. You revert my well described edits I made, describing as "article is only about Political marriages in India; do not introduce origin of any state or kingdom". Later I explained otherwise we have to introduce origin of every state, kingdom or dynasty.
:''NXcrypto restored your changes that I reverted, falsely claimed that I conduct an edit war & leave an edit warning on my Talk page at (08:20, 9 November 2024) in return as I gave you an edit warning at (]).'' ] ] 10:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:42, 10 November 2024

Cage Match

Cage Match can not be used for anything other than match results. This is listed on the Pro Wrestling project sources page. That is a fact, not a POV push. Using sources outside their reliability scale is against WP:RS. 2001:8003:5130:2601:D17D:27F5:C198:B00A (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

retaliatory?

Hi, I have noticed you are calling talkpage messages and warnings as retaliatory in spite of the fact that they really are not. This warning by NXcrypto was received before you warned him so it is not retaliatory, in fact it can be construed as the opposite. You also removed a talkpage message by me calling it "retaliatory" about misidentifying an academic from your talkpage. Do note that you can remove any talkpage message or warning but I would like to know what made you think that it was retaliatory, thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

You revert my well explained edits , then I reverted your edit with a fully explained edit-summary then gave you an edit warning (At 04:39, 9 November 2024) without replying, you removed the warning notice. Then, in retaliation, you gave me an edit warning (at 08:49 but after NXcrypto). I removed this warning per the obvious retaliatory warning and was given in return for this warning I gave you after your attempt of introducing the origin of any particular state at Political marriages in India. You revert my well described edits I made, describing as "article is only about Political marriages in India; do not introduce origin of any state or kingdom". Later I explained otherwise we have to introduce origin of every state, kingdom or dynasty.
NXcrypto restored your changes that I reverted, falsely claimed that I conduct an edit war & leave an edit warning on my Talk page at (08:20, 9 November 2024) in return as I gave you an edit warning at (at 04:39, 9 November 2024). ®asteem Talk 10:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)