Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flusapochterasumesch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:45, 13 November 2024 editKJP1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,687 edits Personal opinions on Misplaced Pages: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 08:09, 13 November 2024 edit undoKJP1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,687 edits Personal opinions on Misplaced PagesTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
== Personal opinions on Misplaced Pages == == Personal opinions on Misplaced Pages ==


I'm puzzled as to why you would argue for the inclusion of the word "]" in the ] article, when you argued even more vehemently for the removal of the term "out of wedlock" in the ] article. It's important that we don't allow our own views and opinions - "Welby is, '''''sadly''''', still the Archbishop of Canterbury" (my bold/italics, your words) to impact on our editing here, and that the edits we make reflect a ]. Regards. ] (]) 07:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC) I'm puzzled as to why you would argue for the inclusion of the word "]" in the ] article, when you argued even more vehemently for the removal of the term "out of wedlock" in the ] article. It's important that we don't allow our own views and opinions - "Welby is, '''''sadly''''', still the Archbishop of Canterbury" (my bold/italics, your words) - to impact on our editing here, and that the edits we make reflect a ]. Regards. ] (]) 07:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:09, 13 November 2024

Welcome

Personal opinions on Misplaced Pages

I'm puzzled as to why you would argue for the inclusion of the word "bastard" in the Justin Welby article, when you argued even more vehemently for the removal of the term "out of wedlock" in the T. E. Lawrence article. It's important that we don't allow our own views and opinions - "Welby is, sadly, still the Archbishop of Canterbury" (my bold/italics, your words) - to impact on our editing here, and that the edits we make reflect a Neutral point of view. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 07:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)