| Revision as of 16:18, 24 April 2007 editMarkun (talk | contribs)20 edits added question about the Gigabeat X OLED claim← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:12, 25 April 2007 edit undoDarkcurrent (talk | contribs)99 edits →<<<Bleeped for inappropriateness>>>Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :Oh thanks! Well there isn't really any route to editing in Misplaced Pages. Just start with articles concerning your interest, then grow from minor editing to clean-ups and such. Try editing less popular articles first. That way your changes will last longer and, in time, will be more prominent. --''''']'''''/PenaltyKillah<sup>]</sup><sub>'''''GO]GO!!</sub>''''' 00:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | :Oh thanks! Well there isn't really any route to editing in Misplaced Pages. Just start with articles concerning your interest, then grow from minor editing to clean-ups and such. Try editing less popular articles first. That way your changes will last longer and, in time, will be more prominent. --''''']'''''/PenaltyKillah<sup>]</sup><sub>'''''GO]GO!!</sub>''''' 00:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == FUCkING PIECE OF SHIT DON"T CHANGE THE SUBJECT == | |||
| == <<<Bleeped for inappropriateness>>> == | |||
| I was the one who recognized that it was a left facing swastika. | I was the one who recognized that it was a left facing swastika. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Thanks being a non-observant faggot and stealing my work asshole --] 14:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | Thanks being a non-observant faggot and stealing my work asshole --] 14:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :If you look at the history of the page, you'll see that I added the picture and the comment first. But let's not argue over this, alright? Many people do know that the swastika is left-facing, so it's not a coincidence. Anyway, the main purpose of the ] section was to specify that school's problem. --''''']'''''/PenaltyKillah<sup>]</sup><sub>'''''GO]GO!!</sub>''''' 21:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | :If you look at the history of the page, you'll see that I added the picture and the comment first. But let's not argue over this, alright? Many people do know that the swastika is left-facing, so it's not a coincidence. Anyway, the main purpose of the ] section was to specify that school's problem. --''''']'''''/PenaltyKillah<sup>]</sup><sub>'''''GO]GO!!</sub>''''' 21:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| How about you suck my balls? Your userpage says you're against censorship on wikipedia and you just censored my original title. | |||
| what a fucking hypocrite. | |||
| I don't give a flying fuck that you added the picture, YOU didn't spot the error that it was a symbol of buddism and passed it off as a symbol of nazi. You fucking moron, what the fuck does "Many people do know that the swastika is left-facing, so it's not a coincidence." - JW21 even mean? | |||
| fucking moron, the point here is that a right facing swastika represents nazi ideals, a LEFT facing swastika represent buddism ideals. YOU didn't spot that. The SCHOOL didn't spot that. I SPOTTED IT. | |||
| What's the problem in Palmer? that people like spreading the idea of buddism? So should we ban crosses in school? | |||
| Oh, you mean the people who drew it THOUGHT they were drawing a symoble of nazi ideals but instead drew something representing budist ideals? well wouldn't that qualify them for fucking RETARDS AS I ORIGINALLY WROTE? | |||
| FUCKING HIGHSCHOOL PIECE OF SHIT MORON. It's POV warriors, hypocrite and morons like you which makes wikipedia suck balls. | |||
| == Thanks == | == Thanks == | ||
Revision as of 03:12, 25 April 2007
Fan Sites Part 2
I am reposting this again. You seemed to have deleted my post without addressing it.
RE: Vancouver Canucks Please be diplomatic with removing fan sites. These sites are cleary in violation of the rules as well. canuckscentral.com unofficial fansite canuckscorner.com unofficial fansite
- Removed. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO!! 23:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks MKII
Just wanted to say that you've done some top notch work on that comparison page. Newbie to wiki but hope this is the proper route. --Trixxy 16:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oh thanks! Well there isn't really any route to editing in Misplaced Pages. Just start with articles concerning your interest, then grow from minor editing to clean-ups and such. Try editing less popular articles first. That way your changes will last longer and, in time, will be more prominent. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO!! 00:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
FUCkING PIECE OF SHIT DON"T CHANGE THE SUBJECT
I was the one who recognized that it was a left facing swastika.
And those morons are retarded for making a left facing swastika not a right one.
Thanks being a non-observant faggot and stealing my work asshole --Darkcurrent 14:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you look at the history of the page, you'll see that I added the picture and the comment first. But let's not argue over this, alright? Many people do know that the swastika is left-facing, so it's not a coincidence. Anyway, the main purpose of the Vandalism section was to specify that school's problem. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO!! 21:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
How about you suck my balls? Your userpage says you're against censorship on wikipedia and you just censored my original title.
what a fucking hypocrite.
I don't give a flying fuck that you added the picture, YOU didn't spot the error that it was a symbol of buddism and passed it off as a symbol of nazi. You fucking moron, what the fuck does "Many people do know that the swastika is left-facing, so it's not a coincidence." - JW21 even mean?
fucking moron, the point here is that a right facing swastika represents nazi ideals, a LEFT facing swastika represent buddism ideals. YOU didn't spot that. The SCHOOL didn't spot that. I SPOTTED IT.
What's the problem in Palmer? that people like spreading the idea of buddism? So should we ban crosses in school?
Oh, you mean the people who drew it THOUGHT they were drawing a symoble of nazi ideals but instead drew something representing budist ideals? well wouldn't that qualify them for fucking RETARDS AS I ORIGINALLY WROTE?
FUCKING HIGHSCHOOL PIECE OF SHIT MORON. It's POV warriors, hypocrite and morons like you which makes wikipedia suck balls.
Thanks
My first barnstar. Was there something in particular I did to deserve this? AlistairMcMillan 06:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I've noticed your significant contributions to various articles, including your commitment to Digital audio player. Just look here and you'll see why. Quality edits should deserve some praise. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 18:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Your addition to Zen creative
The Amazon link you provided http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr_st/103-6330790-3379033?page=1&rh=n%3A172282%2Cn%3A1065836%2Cn%3A172630&sort=salesrank&x=8&y=14 didn't show the sales chart of Zen. I don't know if you are an affiliate or just made a mistake. If you don't correct it I will erase your post. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pascal.mr (talk • contribs) 08:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
- The addition of the link to the Amazon sales chart for MP3 players have been practised across several pages about digital audio players. By placing the link next to the paragraph in the article, I was trying to represent the Zen's popularity, rivalling Apple and SanDisk. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 01:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Your Claims...
Fellow editors, I, being a long-time editor in Misplaced Pages, would like to discuss why I am allegedly accused of spamming. The article(s) Creative Zen and Creative Zen Vision:M had the website EpiZENter for a year, and I am not a member, nor an affilate of EpiZENter. The link had been in the article(s) before I contributed to them, and thus I am only doing my part to preserve the article(s) when the site's link is removed.
If it does concern my removal of fansites, which unlike EpiZENter and other related sites, does not provide any content that may be helpful to a researcher collecting information of the product, or an user of the product. That is why I removed those links, but not sites like EpiZENter. I assert that no acts of hypocrisy has been committed. I may apologize for using the caps to demand other editors to stop advertising their own fansites.
If you can learn to realize this misunderstanding, I'd be glad. I have decided to remain EpiZENter's link removed until disputes can be settled.Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 01:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Jw21, I felt that if the article is to contain only official links then EpiZENter would not qualify. I understand from the above that this is not the case and that beneficial content for a user of the product is relevant. In this case I would like to understand why the link I added containing unique troubleshooting content is not appropriate. See http://www.fixya.com/support/p214473-creative_labs_zen_touch_20_gb_mp3_player. 217.132.157.198 08:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- (To anonymous user, not Jw21):- You were probably spamming fixya.com there, like you've been spamming it everywhere else- that's why. I've undone all your spam links; read the guidelines for external links before you whine about this. Fourohfour 19:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- The articles are for troubleshooting, which is not beneficial for researchers. And the Zen Touch is an end-of-life product. Misplaced Pages do not wish to use this site as a place for people to find solutions to the defects of their products. Other sites are a muser wiser choice, like Yahoo! Answers or the Creative.com forums (link in the Zen article) For more information, check out Misplaced Pages:External links#Links normally to be avoided. If you can notice it, many pages in sites like EpiZENter has much more in-depth information, specifications, and reviews that is more detailed than the Creative Zen article alone, just like iriver's IriverWiki. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 16:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I quote from your initial post "...does not provide any content that may be helpful to... an user of the product" I think fixya and the likes hold unique and crucial information for the end user. Think of all the people that have problems troubleshooting the Zen, I'm sure many would turn to Misplaced Pages to learn more about their product. As for researches, although I agree it wouldn't be my first choice, this is a unique way to understand what are the common problems and defects of the product (just like they would in EpiZENter). Forums of Zen are in abundance, it would seem unfair to stick to one. If you see EpiZenter relevant, Fixya should be relevant as well. 84.229.255.26 19:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Notice I typed "end-of-life product". Although Misplaced Pages does not condone this kind of links, you are free to add the link to the article. After all, this site is a wiki. But please, under a separate sub-heading. How about "User-generated Support"? --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 22:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've learned a lot from this discussion. 89.138.8.1 09:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yo! You didn't put it under a sub-heading! Never mind, I'll do it myself. Ciao. --Jw21/PenaltyKillahGO'NUCKSGO 18:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've learned a lot from this discussion. 89.138.8.1 09:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- My bad. Thanks again.80.230.4.101 18:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jw21, I removed the section on the Gigabeat page stating that the Gigabeat X has a OLED screen only to discover that you wrote the same claim in another section. Can you tell me why? I just ask because I want to correct it and don't want it to be changed back. Maybe you can answer me in the Gigabeat discussion page. Markun 16:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)