| Revision as of 14:09, 24 March 2007 editDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:23, 25 April 2007 edit undoHornplease (talk | contribs)9,260 edits trimming per wp:soapNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{AyodhyaDebate}} | {{AyodhyaDebate}} | ||
| '''''Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society''''' is a book by ] published in ]. | '''''Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society''''' is a book by ] published in ] by ]. | ||
| The book is about the ] debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and ]. | The book is about the ] debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and ]. | ||
| Elst opines that reaching national integration "requires dropping the anti-Hindu separatist doctrines that have largely been created for the purposes of several imperialisms, and are now being kept afloat with a lot of distortive intellectual and propagandistic effort." | Elst opines that reaching national integration "requires dropping the anti-Hindu separatist doctrines that have largely been created for the purposes of several imperialisms, and are now being kept afloat with a lot of distortive intellectual and propagandistic effort." | ||
| The book attempts to examine the polemics between 'communalists' and 'secularists' in India. He also writes about ] and ], and alleges "that a clear majority of the riots are started by Muslims". In another chapter, the author discusses the banning of books like ]'s ]. In the 14th chapter he discusses the concept of "Hindu Fascism". | |||
| == The Ayodhya debate == | == The Ayodhya debate == | ||
| Elst believes that "in keeping with the internationally accepted standards of methodology and inference in scientific history-writing, we may conclude ... that the ] was built in replacement of a Hindu temple where Ram worship used to take place. In fact, this conclusion is merely a restatement of what was a matter of consensus until a few years ago |
Elst believes that "in keeping with the internationally accepted standards of methodology and inference in scientific history-writing, we may conclude ... that the ] was built in replacement of a Hindu temple where Ram worship used to take place. In fact, this conclusion is merely a restatement of what was a matter of consensus until a few years ago." | ||
| But Elst does not believe in a forcible take-over of ancient temples. According to him, the Hindus should ask for a gesture of good will: | But Elst does not believe in a forcible take-over of ancient temples. According to him, the Hindus should ask for a gesture of good will: | ||
Revision as of 05:23, 25 April 2007
| File:Bookcover ayodhya.jpg | |
| Author | Koenraad Elst |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Publication date | 1991 |
| Publication place | India |
Template:AyodhyaDebate Ayodhya and After: Issues Before Hindu Society is a book by Koenraad Elst published in 1991 by Voice of India.
The book is about the Ayodhya debate, but does also discuss Indian politics and communalism. Elst opines that reaching national integration "requires dropping the anti-Hindu separatist doctrines that have largely been created for the purposes of several imperialisms, and are now being kept afloat with a lot of distortive intellectual and propagandistic effort."
The book attempts to examine the polemics between 'communalists' and 'secularists' in India. He also writes about Indian Secularism and Communalism, and alleges "that a clear majority of the riots are started by Muslims". In another chapter, the author discusses the banning of books like Ram Swarup's Understanding Islam through Hadis. In the 14th chapter he discusses the concept of "Hindu Fascism".
The Ayodhya debate
Elst believes that "in keeping with the internationally accepted standards of methodology and inference in scientific history-writing, we may conclude ... that the Babri Masjid was built in replacement of a Hindu temple where Ram worship used to take place. In fact, this conclusion is merely a restatement of what was a matter of consensus until a few years ago."
But Elst does not believe in a forcible take-over of ancient temples. According to him, the Hindus should ask for a gesture of good will:
- The Hindu leaders should say to the Muslim leaders : Look, we want these places back. For many centuries they have been our sacred places, and we have suffered the mosques built there only under duress. We do not believe in the forcible take-over of places of worship, we are not Babars and Aurangzebs. But we want from you a gesture of goodwill, a sign that you turn this infamous persecution page of history. We will not take any kind of revenge if you do not feel ready for this gesture, but we will expressly wait until you are ready.
In one chapter, the book describes the press reporting on the debate. Elst alleges that the media was controlled by the anti-Temple side, and that "the foreign press has not added any extra facts or perspective to the reporting on Ayodhya. It has mostly copied the bias of the Indian press."
Categories: