Revision as of 00:11, 16 November 2024 editWeb-julio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,071 edits →Requested move 14 November 2024← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:14, 16 November 2024 edit undoWeb-julio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,071 edits →Requested move 14 November 2024Next edit → |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
{{requested move/dated|Intersex representation in film}} |
|
{{requested move/dated|Intersex representation in film}} |
|
|
|
|
|
] → {{no redirect|Intersex representation in films}} – This or ] (or a better grammatically phrased title), based on the Wikidata description. Intersex is mainly an adjective, but even as a noun it sounds strange this way. The new title, Intersex representation in films, fits better. I'm not sure if all of these films have intersex characters, but if they do, we could rename including the word characters. Note: the word intersexuality is avoided due to conflation with orientation, and intersexness is a protologism I guess. ] (]) 20:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
] → {{no redirect|Intersex representation in film}} – This or ] (or a better grammatically phrased title), based on the Wikidata description. Intersex is mainly an adjective, but even as a noun it sounds strange this way. The new title, Intersex representation in films, fits better. I'm not sure if all of these films have intersex characters, but if they do, we could rename including the word characters. Note: the word intersexuality is avoided due to conflation with orientation, and intersexness is a protologism I guess. ] (]) 20:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:<small>Note: ], ], ], ], and ] have been notified of this discussion. ] (]) 20:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
:<small>Note: ], ], ], ], and ] have been notified of this discussion. ] (]) 20:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
:'''Support''' (but maybe with alt proposal "Intersex representation in film")—Yeah, intersex is usually used as an adjective. The closest other article I can find that is similar in scope is ], maybe indicating that the -s should be left off per ]. I think either title would be preferable to "Films about intersex," however. ] (]) 22:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:'''Support''' (but maybe with alt proposal "Intersex representation in film")—Yeah, intersex is usually used as an adjective. The closest other article I can find that is similar in scope is ], maybe indicating that the -s should be left off per ]. I think either title would be preferable to "Films about intersex," however. ] (]) 22:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
*:In that case, I think all three titles should be changed (maybe ("Intersex literature" per ], therefore "Intersex film"/"Intersex television works" or "Intersex representation in film" per ], therefore "Intersex representation in literature"/"Intersex representation in television works"). I also don't know if they're strictly lists. Compare to ], which is literally just a bulleted list of films with a country + year. There's a bit more going on in each of these articles. ] (]) 15:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*:In that case, I think all three titles should be changed (maybe ("Intersex literature" per ], therefore "Intersex film"/"Intersex television works" or "Intersex representation in film" per ], therefore "Intersex representation in literature"/"Intersex representation in television works"). I also don't know if they're strictly lists. Compare to ], which is literally just a bulleted list of films with a country + year. There's a bit more going on in each of these articles. ] (]) 15:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*::I think the latter would be a bit more ] given the scope of the article right now, but again, either preferable to the current title. ] (]) 15:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*::I think the latter would be a bit more ] given the scope of the article right now, but again, either preferable to the current title. ] (]) 15:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*:I didn't saw the other list articles. Anyways, I don't know how to sort multiple RM discussions into on. |
|
*:I didn't saw the other list articles. Anyways, I don't know how to sort multiple RM discussions into 1. |
|
*:There was a CfD: ], so following that discussion, "literature about intersex" should be renamed into ]. Television works might have a different outcome though, as I don't think "intersex television works" would work harmoniously/agradably/pleasingfully. ] (]) 00:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*:There was a CfD: ], so following that discussion, "literature about intersex" should be renamed into ]. Television works might have a different outcome though, as I don't think "intersex television works" would work harmoniously/agradably/pleasingfully. ] (]) 00:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*Note: since no one supported "in films" I changed the RM request to reflect that now I support this version. ] (]) 00:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
*Note: since no one supported "in films" I changed the RM request to reflect that now I support this version. ] (]) 00:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |