Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:03, 17 November 2024

File copyright problem with File:4cc-mlp.png

Thank you for uploading File:4cc-mlp.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 06:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:4cc-mlp.png

Thanks for uploading File:4cc-mlp.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 12:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

I have made a note at https://implyingrigged.info/File:Mlp_logo.png#Copyright_Notice that the file is available under CC-BY-SA, if this is to your satisfaction please remove the template on the file. 37.4.232.160 (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 15.ai

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 15.ai you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SirGallantThe4th -- SirGallantThe4th (talk) 23:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 15.ai

The article 15.ai you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:15.ai for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SirGallantThe4th -- SirGallantThe4th (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 15.ai

The article 15.ai you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:15.ai for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SirGallantThe4th -- SirGallantThe4th (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 15.ai, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I've been following the Manual of Style closely, and I don't see how the other edits that were reverted deviated from the MoS.

I suspect that the revert was triggered because I included an external link in the image description in my latest edit. I've removed that and have re-reverted my other edits. HackerKnownAs (talk) 19:56, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for 15.ai

On 9 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 15.ai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the developer of 15.ai claims that as little as 15 seconds of a person's voice is sufficient to clone it up to human standards using artificial intelligence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/15.ai. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 15.ai), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Screenshot from The Tax Breaks.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Screenshot from The Tax Breaks.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 9 (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

File:4cc-mlp.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:4cc-mlp.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 9 (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

File:15 ai logo transparent.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:15 ai logo transparent.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi 197.185.115.235 (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:15 ai logo transparent.png

Thank you for uploading File:15 ai logo transparent.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 23:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for 15.ai

15.ai has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hi, You recently reverted my 15.ai edit. We had a discussion at the DRN and thought that this would be the way to fix it- removing the current status as well as adding the thoughts of the community. If you want, here is the link Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Fifth statement by moderator (15.ai) for proof. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 11:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Brocade River Poems (She/They) 00:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Liz 04:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, HackerKnownAs,

Please do not make personal attacks or cast aspersions on another editor without providing evidence. Continuing to do so after being warned can result in a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz 05:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

I would appreciate you striking your last comment here which is a personal attack upon another editor, casting aspersions without providing evidence. You can't level accusations against another editor just because you disagree with them. That's not how things work here. That comment alone is enough to warrant a block and I recommend that you strike it. Liz 07:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi HackerKnownAs! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 15.ai several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:15.ai, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz 05:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, HackerKnownAs,

I hadn't known that you also have been edit-warring on this article. You have been reverting and re-reverting other editors and your edit summary does not provide justification for edit warring. There are few exceptions to the edit-warring/3R guideline and thinking that you are right and other editors are wrong is not one of them. You are getting caught up with the status of this article and being so invested can lead to errors in judgment that can result in a block. Please step back and be more careful. Liz 05:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry. I will try to be more careful next time. I genuinely was not aware that what I was doing was edit warring – I will be more cognizant. HackerKnownAs (talk) 05:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, it looks like some of the evidence that I posted related to my ban appeal was redacted by another admin. I am unable to post on their talk page due to the block. What can I do? HackerKnownAs (talk) 23:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

I have created an unblock request. Thank you for your consideration. HackerKnownAs (talk) 15:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

HackerKnownAs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We realize that the Checkuser note came back positive because we were sharing devices. Indeed, we recently met up in person for the first time not a week ago, before any of the admin noticeboard drama happened (and are still meeting in person right now) - I can share the airplane tickets as proof if necessary (, please note the dates). However, prior to this, we had never met before. We are separate people, and you can check our edit histories to verify that we have never shared an IP address prior to this interaction.

We apologize for the creation of the other two accounts that were flagged, but we would like to stress that we are different people. Punish us if you must for the other two accounts, but please reconsider the block you put on us. We have contributed many substantial edits to Misplaced Pages, and we have always tried to operate under good faith up until this interaction with someone who we felt were antagonizing us.

To clarify, the account "Andthewinnerisme" was supposed to be a joke that SirGallantThe4th created because of the suspicious IP editor asking for a sanction on HackerKnownAs (he didn't realize that it would be considered sockpuppeting and is very sorry about it), and "Rin6626" was made by a friend of his who had a bad sense of humor who was also visiting us (I was not aware that he made this account until after the CheckUser block, as he usually posts as an IP editor).

Again, we are sorry for the mess this has caused, but please note that we are all separate people. I was attempting to respond to a comment in the UTRS ticket, but an admin responded that there is no excuse for sockpuppetry and recruiting off-Wiki participants, and before I could respond, the ticket was closed. I would like to stress that we have never recruited off-Wiki participants ever, and the friend mentioned above was someone who already was familiar with the recent drama but didn’t have an account, as he posts as an IP editor. Neither I nor SirGallantThe4th had any malicious intent to sockpuppet.

(Edited because I did not see the part about what constructive edits I would make)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am writing to appeal a block that occurred just an hour ago on Misplaced Pages on our user accounts. I would like to clarify that while we (HackerKnownAs and ]) do not dispute that we created the other account (Andthewinnerisme), we would like to say that we only felt pressured to do so because of all of the other IP accounts that seemingly were all in support of the OP instead, which felt suspicious to us. We realize that the Checkuser note came back positive because we were sharing devices. Indeed, we recently met up in person for the first time not a week ago, before any of the admin noticeboard drama happened (and are still meeting in person right now) - I can share the airplane tickets as proof if necessary (, please note the dates). However, prior to this, we had never met before. We are separate people, and you can check our edit histories to verify that we have never shared an IP address prior to this interaction. We apologize for the creation of the other two accounts that were flagged, but we would like to stress that we are different people. Punish us if you must for the other two accounts, but please reconsider the block you put on us. We have contributed many substantial edits to Misplaced Pages, and we have always tried to operate under good faith up until this interaction with someone who we felt were antagonizing us. To clarify, the account "Andthewinnerisme" was supposed to be a joke that SirGallantThe4th created because of the suspicious IP editor asking for a sanction on HackerKnownAs (he didn't realize that it would be considered sockpuppeting and is very sorry about it), and "Rin6626" was made by a friend of his who had a bad sense of humor who was also visiting us (I was not aware that he made this account until after the CheckUser block, as he usually posts as an IP editor). Again, we are sorry for the mess this has caused, but please note that we are all separate people. I was attempting to respond to a comment in the UTRS ticket, but an admin responded that there is no excuse for sockpuppetry and recruiting off-Wiki participants, and before I could respond, the ticket was closed. I would like to stress that we have never recruited off-Wiki participants ever, and the friend mentioned above was someone who already was familiar with the recent drama but didn’t have an account, as he posts as an IP editor. Neither I nor SirGallantThe4th had any malicious intent to sockpuppet. (Edited because I did not see the part about what constructive edits I would make) I would continue to make edits as I have done for four years on Misplaced Pages. I’ve mostly been lurking around articles related to Internet culture, and I like to think that I put in good work whenever I can, often going the extra mile. See, for example, on my work on the ] article &ndash I spent hours listing all of the 4chan boards in a Misplaced Pages style table. My conduct in the AN/I board was because I am still woefully inexperienced when it comes to the rules of Misplaced Pages. When an admin advised to move the AN discussion about me to AN/I, I took this to mean that I should be the one to move it, which ] then advised me that that was not she had meant. I’m still learning, and I apologize again for the trouble. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am writing to appeal a block that occurred just an hour ago on Misplaced Pages on our user accounts. I would like to clarify that while we (HackerKnownAs and ]) do not dispute that we created the other account (Andthewinnerisme), we would like to say that we only felt pressured to do so because of all of the other IP accounts that seemingly were all in support of the OP instead, which felt suspicious to us. We realize that the Checkuser note came back positive because we were sharing devices. Indeed, we recently met up in person for the first time not a week ago, before any of the admin noticeboard drama happened (and are still meeting in person right now) - I can share the airplane tickets as proof if necessary (, please note the dates). However, prior to this, we had never met before. We are separate people, and you can check our edit histories to verify that we have never shared an IP address prior to this interaction. We apologize for the creation of the other two accounts that were flagged, but we would like to stress that we are different people. Punish us if you must for the other two accounts, but please reconsider the block you put on us. We have contributed many substantial edits to Misplaced Pages, and we have always tried to operate under good faith up until this interaction with someone who we felt were antagonizing us. To clarify, the account "Andthewinnerisme" was supposed to be a joke that SirGallantThe4th created because of the suspicious IP editor asking for a sanction on HackerKnownAs (he didn't realize that it would be considered sockpuppeting and is very sorry about it), and "Rin6626" was made by a friend of his who had a bad sense of humor who was also visiting us (I was not aware that he made this account until after the CheckUser block, as he usually posts as an IP editor). Again, we are sorry for the mess this has caused, but please note that we are all separate people. I was attempting to respond to a comment in the UTRS ticket, but an admin responded that there is no excuse for sockpuppetry and recruiting off-Wiki participants, and before I could respond, the ticket was closed. I would like to stress that we have never recruited off-Wiki participants ever, and the friend mentioned above was someone who already was familiar with the recent drama but didn’t have an account, as he posts as an IP editor. Neither I nor SirGallantThe4th had any malicious intent to sockpuppet. (Edited because I did not see the part about what constructive edits I would make) I would continue to make edits as I have done for four years on Misplaced Pages. I’ve mostly been lurking around articles related to Internet culture, and I like to think that I put in good work whenever I can, often going the extra mile. See, for example, on my work on the ] article &ndash I spent hours listing all of the 4chan boards in a Misplaced Pages style table. My conduct in the AN/I board was because I am still woefully inexperienced when it comes to the rules of Misplaced Pages. When an admin advised to move the AN discussion about me to AN/I, I took this to mean that I should be the one to move it, which ] then advised me that that was not she had meant. I’m still learning, and I apologize again for the trouble. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am writing to appeal a block that occurred just an hour ago on Misplaced Pages on our user accounts. I would like to clarify that while we (HackerKnownAs and ]) do not dispute that we created the other account (Andthewinnerisme), we would like to say that we only felt pressured to do so because of all of the other IP accounts that seemingly were all in support of the OP instead, which felt suspicious to us. We realize that the Checkuser note came back positive because we were sharing devices. Indeed, we recently met up in person for the first time not a week ago, before any of the admin noticeboard drama happened (and are still meeting in person right now) - I can share the airplane tickets as proof if necessary (, please note the dates). However, prior to this, we had never met before. We are separate people, and you can check our edit histories to verify that we have never shared an IP address prior to this interaction. We apologize for the creation of the other two accounts that were flagged, but we would like to stress that we are different people. Punish us if you must for the other two accounts, but please reconsider the block you put on us. We have contributed many substantial edits to Misplaced Pages, and we have always tried to operate under good faith up until this interaction with someone who we felt were antagonizing us. To clarify, the account "Andthewinnerisme" was supposed to be a joke that SirGallantThe4th created because of the suspicious IP editor asking for a sanction on HackerKnownAs (he didn't realize that it would be considered sockpuppeting and is very sorry about it), and "Rin6626" was made by a friend of his who had a bad sense of humor who was also visiting us (I was not aware that he made this account until after the CheckUser block, as he usually posts as an IP editor). Again, we are sorry for the mess this has caused, but please note that we are all separate people. I was attempting to respond to a comment in the UTRS ticket, but an admin responded that there is no excuse for sockpuppetry and recruiting off-Wiki participants, and before I could respond, the ticket was closed. I would like to stress that we have never recruited off-Wiki participants ever, and the friend mentioned above was someone who already was familiar with the recent drama but didn’t have an account, as he posts as an IP editor. Neither I nor SirGallantThe4th had any malicious intent to sockpuppet. (Edited because I did not see the part about what constructive edits I would make) I would continue to make edits as I have done for four years on Misplaced Pages. I’ve mostly been lurking around articles related to Internet culture, and I like to think that I put in good work whenever I can, often going the extra mile. See, for example, on my work on the ] article &ndash I spent hours listing all of the 4chan boards in a Misplaced Pages style table. My conduct in the AN/I board was because I am still woefully inexperienced when it comes to the rules of Misplaced Pages. When an admin advised to move the AN discussion about me to AN/I, I took this to mean that I should be the one to move it, which ] then advised me that that was not she had meant. I’m still learning, and I apologize again for the trouble. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock