| Revision as of 02:21, 23 November 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,824 edits →The Hardy Boys: Move to FARC← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:49, 23 November 2024 edit undoNikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users232,136 edits sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{Featured article tools|1=The Hardy Boys}}</noinclude> | {{Featured article tools|1=The Hardy Boys}}</noinclude> | ||
| :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ]''</small> | :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ]''</small> | ||
| ====Review section==== | |||
| I am nominating this featured article for review because...This old article isn't written properly. Some of the citations are poorly formatted, for example. the lack of authors and etc. + There are several unsourced statements and too many quote tables + It needs some updates for books and video game appearances + the books, in-other media (should be converted into prose written style, not lists), comics, and especially the video game sections are a mess + Thematic analysis and reception could be expanded. Overall, it needs some love to meet its current FA standard. 🍕]🍕 (]) 06:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | I am nominating this featured article for review because...This old article isn't written properly. Some of the citations are poorly formatted, for example. the lack of authors and etc. + There are several unsourced statements and too many quote tables + It needs some updates for books and video game appearances + the books, in-other media (should be converted into prose written style, not lists), comics, and especially the video game sections are a mess + Thematic analysis and reception could be expanded. Overall, it needs some love to meet its current FA standard. 🍕]🍕 (]) 06:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :From a cursory read, the quote tables do certainly seem a bit odd. They don't provide much context for the work for someone not familiar, and they don't (at first glance) support the content in the text in an obvious way... added captions to put the quotes in context might help. Some parts ("It has been a matter of disagreement regarding the treatment of minorities in the books.") seem like they would fit better in a criticism or reception section. ] (]) 16:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | :From a cursory read, the quote tables do certainly seem a bit odd. They don't provide much context for the work for someone not familiar, and they don't (at first glance) support the content in the text in an obvious way... added captions to put the quotes in context might help. Some parts ("It has been a matter of disagreement regarding the treatment of minorities in the books.") seem like they would fit better in a criticism or reception section. ] (]) 16:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Move to FARC''': Agree with concerns raised above, and no progress to resolve them. ] (]) 02:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | *'''Move to FARC''': Agree with concerns raised above, and no progress to resolve them. ] (]) 02:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ====FARC section==== | |||
| :''Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. ] (]) 18:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)'' | |||
Revision as of 18:49, 23 November 2024
The Hardy Boys
The Hardy Boys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: WikiProject Children's literature, WikiProject Novels, WikiProject Fictional characters, Ricardiana
Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because...This old article isn't written properly. Some of the citations are poorly formatted, for example. the lack of authors and etc. + There are several unsourced statements and too many quote tables + It needs some updates for books and video game appearances + the books, in-other media (should be converted into prose written style, not lists), comics, and especially the video game sections are a mess + Thematic analysis and reception could be expanded. Overall, it needs some love to meet its current FA standard. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 06:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- From a cursory read, the quote tables do certainly seem a bit odd. They don't provide much context for the work for someone not familiar, and they don't (at first glance) support the content in the text in an obvious way... added captions to put the quotes in context might help. Some parts ("It has been a matter of disagreement regarding the treatment of minorities in the books.") seem like they would fit better in a criticism or reception section. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Move to FARC: Agree with concerns raised above, and no progress to resolve them. Z1720 (talk) 02:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)