Revision as of 19:43, 23 November 2024 editJinnllee90 (talk | contribs)92 edits →Ex Muslim SahilTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:23, 23 November 2024 edit undo4meter4 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users109,185 edits →Ex Muslim Sahil: keepNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Keep''' Refs 1, 2, and 5 appear to be non-trivial independent RS'es. Above !voter misstates the GNG. ] (]) 19:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Refs 1, 2, and 5 appear to be non-trivial independent RS'es. Above !voter misstates the GNG. ] (]) 19:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' By the simple fact of being a Muslim against ] you can maintain and improve. ] (]) 19:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' By the simple fact of being a Muslim against ] you can maintain and improve. ] (]) 19:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. Passes ] per the analysis by Jclemens.] (]) 21:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:23, 23 November 2024
Ex Muslim Sahil
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Ex Muslim Sahil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only one citation in India Today is good, in my view. Looking at other, Dainik Bhaskar is just an Interview which doesn't contribute to Notability. Rest 2, one of Delhi Magazine and another of TheSportsGrail are not enough to prove Notability. TheChronikler7 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, Islam, and India. TheChronikler7 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: The subject fails to meet WP:GNG as no WP:SIGCOV sources were found. While the India Today article provides some information about this YouTuber, it is insufficient to justify a stand-alone article. Multiple in-depth articles from independent, reliable sources are required. At present, the subject does not meet notability guidlines. GrabUp - Talk 18:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Refs 1, 2, and 5 appear to be non-trivial independent RS'es. Above !voter misstates the GNG. Jclemens (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep By the simple fact of being a Muslim against Islam you can maintain and improve. Jinnllee90 (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV per the analysis by Jclemens.4meter4 (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2024 (UTC)