Misplaced Pages

Talk:Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:41, 24 November 2024 editProKMT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,327 edits Socialism sidebar← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:49, 24 November 2024 edit undoGuotaian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,522 edits Socialism sidebar: ReplyTag: Reply 
Line 30: Line 30:
== Socialism sidebar == == Socialism sidebar ==
{{ping|Guotaian|Yue}} The FTU was referred to as "pro-business and politically conservative" by Sprague 2015. The FTU is not a common socialist organization. Therefore, I think it's a very unnecessary sidebar to use in articles. ] (]) 06:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC) {{ping|Guotaian|Yue}} The FTU was referred to as "pro-business and politically conservative" by Sprague 2015. The FTU is not a common socialist organization. Therefore, I think it's a very unnecessary sidebar to use in articles. ] (]) 06:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

:FTU is overwhelmingly described by sources (eg. Leong 2009, Lo 2010, Radio France Internationale, Sing Tao Daily , 雄學琛...) as being left-wing and socialist and has been since its inception. The party was "Inspired by the ], the HKFTU escalated labour disputes into the ]." Up to today, it continues to advocate for "the rights and welfare of workers, supporting workers in their negotiations with employers and helping them resolve labour disputes" and "has a pro-grassroots stance on livelihood and labour issues, such as demanding more measures to reduce ]." Additionally, " HKFTU also operates five retail outlets which provide discounted goods and services to its members. Businesses include catering, credit card facilities, medical services, and travel agencies."
:There is only one source that mentions the FTU as pro-business. Even in that source, the only justification for the "pro-business" label is that it "has ties to China's official All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU)", which is certainly not " pro-business and politically conservative". The source is conflating the the definition of politically conservative in western countries with those of Hong Kong as in western countries, politically conservative means pro-business (and capitalistic). However, Hong Kong style conservatism means supporting the "establishment" such as the chinese central government. Conservatives in Hong Kong are therefore a big-tent and vary on economic stances. ] (]) 08:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:49, 24 November 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHong Kong Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

Collaboration needed

Improvement needed

Cleanup needed

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Deorphan needed

Page creation needed

Miscellaneous tasks

WikiProject iconOrganized Labour High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Political parties
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconSocialism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Name of article

Shouldn't this article be at Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, the bolded name of the organisation (now a redirect)? That would also serve the purpose of avoiding confusion with the general concept of trade union federations. Similarily, Confederation of Trade Unions should probably be moved to Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions. / Alarm 13:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Umm.. It's a choice between the full name and the common name.. :-D — Instantnood 17:24, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Ideology

The source listed claiming the organization is conservative/pro-business checks out, but I found another source claiming almost the opposite (that the organization is more left-wing or socialist-esque). What should be done? HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 11:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

The policy-section kinda backs a more left-wing position. However it is completely possible they might be socially conservative and economically socialist or social democratic! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
That's what I originally thought, then I looked up the first source, and saw the claim that the organization was pro-business, which at least in my mind, tends to rule out left-leaning positions. You rarely see even social-democratic parties described as pro-business unless they espouse more Third Way policies. The sources seem to be at-odds with one another. The only thing I can think of as to why this is may be that since the leftist organization is pro-Beijing, that makes it conservative by HK standards? Or maybe they're just pragmatic and switch positions? Not sure though. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 13:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Maybe it would be better to avoid bias and use an actual statement by the organisation. Too often westerners have wild ideas about what things are like in China, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.3.222.23 (talk) 23:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

References

  1. Tsui, Anna P.Y.; Lai, K.T. (2009). "Professional Practices of Human Resource Management in Hong Kong". Hong Kong University Press. p. 203. ISBN 9789622090606.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Socialism sidebar

@Guotaian and Yue: The FTU was referred to as "pro-business and politically conservative" by Sprague 2015. The FTU is not a common socialist organization. Therefore, I think it's a very unnecessary sidebar to use in articles. ProKMT (talk) 06:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

FTU is overwhelmingly described by sources (eg. Leong 2009, Lo 2010, Radio France Internationale, Sing Tao Daily , 雄學琛...) as being left-wing and socialist and has been since its inception. The party was "Inspired by the Cultural Revolution, the HKFTU escalated labour disputes into the 1967 riots against British colonial rule." Up to today, it continues to advocate for "the rights and welfare of workers, supporting workers in their negotiations with employers and helping them resolve labour disputes" and "has a pro-grassroots stance on livelihood and labour issues, such as demanding more measures to reduce unemployment." Additionally, " HKFTU also operates five retail outlets which provide discounted goods and services to its members. Businesses include catering, credit card facilities, medical services, and travel agencies."
There is only one source that mentions the FTU as pro-business. Even in that source, the only justification for the "pro-business" label is that it "has ties to China's official All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU)", which is certainly not " pro-business and politically conservative". The source is conflating the the definition of politically conservative in western countries with those of Hong Kong as in western countries, politically conservative means pro-business (and capitalistic). However, Hong Kong style conservatism means supporting the "establishment" such as the chinese central government. Conservatives in Hong Kong are therefore a big-tent and vary on economic stances. Guotaian (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories: