| Revision as of 00:57, 25 November 2024 editRorshacma (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,646 edits →Nucky Thompson← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:44, 25 November 2024 edit undoShooterwalker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,479 edits →Nucky ThompsonNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. ''']''' ] ] 07:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. ''']''' ] ] 07:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Procedural Close''' - A cursory search is showing a pretty large difference in potential notability for the different characters in this bundle, making it impossible to avoid a ]. As stated by 4meter4 already, there should be no prejudice against subsequently nominating some of them individually, but the discussion for all of them as a bundled nomination is not going to work. ] (]) 00:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | *'''Procedural Close''' - A cursory search is showing a pretty large difference in potential notability for the different characters in this bundle, making it impossible to avoid a ]. As stated by 4meter4 already, there should be no prejudice against subsequently nominating some of them individually, but the discussion for all of them as a bundled nomination is not going to work. ] (]) 00:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Procedural Close''' per Rorshacma. Even if it achieves the same outcome, this process is all wrong for this many different articles. I see enough early evidence that each article is a little different. By going one-at-a-time, we have a better chance of getting it right. ] (]) 03:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:44, 25 November 2024
Nucky Thompson
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Nucky Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately, as much as i love Boardwalk Empire, Nucky doesn't passes WP:GNG, all the sources are passing mentions of the show and some don't even talk about him. My WP:BEFORE didn't help either. I am also nominating the following related pages because of similar reasons.:
- Jimmy Darmody (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Margaret Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Nelson Van Alden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Eli Thompson (Boardwalk Empire) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mickey Doyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Richard Harrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Gyp Rosetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Valentin Narcisse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Toby2023 (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural close. I am finding WP:SIGCOV on several of these characters. It is going to be a headache to talk about them as a group. No prejudice in the nominator bringing them forward individually, but I strongly oppose a bundled nomination.4meter4 (talk) 04:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural Close - A cursory search is showing a pretty large difference in potential notability for the different characters in this bundle, making it impossible to avoid a WP:TRAINWRECK. As stated by 4meter4 already, there should be no prejudice against subsequently nominating some of them individually, but the discussion for all of them as a bundled nomination is not going to work. Rorshacma (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural Close per Rorshacma. Even if it achieves the same outcome, this process is all wrong for this many different articles. I see enough early evidence that each article is a little different. By going one-at-a-time, we have a better chance of getting it right. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)