Revision as of 04:12, 27 November 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,376,822 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:38, 28 November 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageNext edit → | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> |
Revision as of 16:38, 28 November 2024
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Name articles
Variations of names are a legitimate addition to articles about the history and usage of said names. Most of the variants are included in name dictionaries. i am reverting your deletions and suggest you discuss it on the talk pages before restoring your deletions. Your edits are disputed. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Shia islam: Terminology
I don't believe your recent edit on shia Islam, is constructive. Terminology section is part of the body and should act as a semi full overview. Your edit diminished insight and visibility of the subject. I want to revert it and I'll edit it for clarity if you think it needs more work.
reaching out because I'm watching the page. Bro The Man (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs over at Talk:Shia. PepperBeast (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- i realised i missread the edits you made. They are constructive. thank you. Bro The Man (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)