| Revision as of 19:10, 10 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,610 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:SCOTUS-case|Ashcraft v. Tennessee|327|274|February 25|1946|Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.}}' | Revision as of 19:17, 10 December 2024 edit undoLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,610 edits Reference edited with ProveIt #proveitTag: ProveIt editNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| '''''Ashcraft v. Tennessee''''', {{ussc|volume=327|page=274|year=1946|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=Ashcraft v. Tennessee|volume=327|page=274|year=1946}}.</ref> | '''''Ashcraft v. Tennessee''''', {{ussc|volume=327|page=274|year=1946|el=no}}, was a ] case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.<ref name="case">{{ussc|name=Ashcraft v. Tennessee|volume=327|page=274|year=1946}}.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bennett |first=John Ballard |date=1954 |title=Decade of Change Since the Ashcraft Case |journal=Tex. L. Rev. |volume=32 |pages=429}}</ref> | ||
| == See also == | |||
| *] | |||
| == References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 19:17, 10 December 2024
1946 United States Supreme Court case| Ashcraft v. Tennessee | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided February 25, 1946 | |
| Full case name | Ashcraft v. Tennessee |
| Citations | 327 U.S. 274 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that admitting narrative testimony about the interrogation that elicited an excluded confession can be considered equivalent to the excluded confession, requiring it to also be excluded.
See also
References
- Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 327 U.S. 274 (1946).
- Bennett, John Ballard (1954). "Decade of Change Since the Ashcraft Case". Tex. L. Rev. 32: 429.
External links
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |