Misplaced Pages

Bank of Minden v. Clement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 11 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,657 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:23, 11 December 2024 edit undoLethargilistic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,657 edits added Category:Contract Clause case law using HotCatNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
] ]
] ]
]

Revision as of 10:23, 11 December 2024

1921 United States Supreme Court case
Bank of Minden v. Clement
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 11, 1921
Full case nameBank of Minden v. Clement
Citations256 U.S. 126 (more)
Holding
States may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
MajorityMcReynolds
DissentClarke
Laws applied
Contracts Clause

Bank of Minden v. Clement, 256 U.S. 126 (1921), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that states may not retroactively render valid contracts invalid via statute.

References

  1. Bank of Minden v. Clement, 256 U.S. 126 (1921).

External links

Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: