| Revision as of 00:50, 12 December 2024 editMarchjuly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users111,635 edits →File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg: Added cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:20, 12 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,993 editsm Archiving 7 discussion(s) to User talk:Explicit/Archive 55) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| |{{User:Arjun G. Menon/Userboxes/My Time|+9|South Korea}} | |{{User:Arjun G. Menon/Userboxes/My Time|+9|South Korea}} | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ==Deleted articles== | |||
| Can I please see the deleted article ]. ] (]) 00:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 02:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Can I please see the deleted ]. ] (]) 21:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 06:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Please let me see the deleted ]. ] (]) 05:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 05:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Can I please see the deleted ] article. ] (]) 05:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 05:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Can I please see the deleted article ]. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . It is a promotional mess, but perhaps the sources may be of value. ]] 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Can I please see deleted article ]. ] (]) 20:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 00:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::Please can I see deleted article ]. ] (]) 06:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} . ]] 06:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::::@]@]@] | |||
| ::::::::::::::Hello brillliant minds - perhaps if you wanted for the page to be complete you'd get the gist of things than just rushing to delete the page with empty content. Unlike most of you lucky chaps in developed countries, I had a power outage before I could even complete the page. | |||
| ::::::::::::::So, if possible, heroes of Misplaced Pages, i would like to finish updating the page and only then can you decide to proceed with the deletion. | |||
| ::::::::::::::I'll wait to hear from you masters of the uniververse. | |||
| ::::::::::::::Cheers. ] (]) 11:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} {{Reply to|Aatsol2007}} Hi, which page are you referring to exactly? ]] 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :@] {{tpw}} Perhaps, under your circumstances, you should start out writing a draft, perhaps in ] and then move it to mainspace when you're done, or if you want someone else to check the draft over before it's an article, ]ion. Though I have to agree with Explicit above. Knowing which article we're talking about will help greatly. ] ] ] 06:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Flag photo == | |||
| Would you please restore the local version of ]? It is ineligible for ], as I requested that the file be {{tl|keep local}} after I took and while I was uploading it. Thanks, <small>— ]<sup> (]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">])</sub></small> 08:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The keep local tag was removed by ], and on a bunch of other files too. I've reverted the ones that haven't been deleted yet, but most have been. Explicit, since you probably deleted them all (at least, you did for all the ones where I looked at the logs), would you rather I compile a list, or undelete them myself as I find them? —] 09:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{Reply to|Godsy|Cryptic}} Oh, what a naughty IP. {{Frown}} I went through their deleted contributions and found that most of their edits that resulted in subtracted bytes to the page were replacing {{tl|keep local}} with {{tl|mtc}}. I've restored a few more files. ]] 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I've restored ], where {{tl|keep local}} was replaced with {{tl|move to Commons}} and so added bytes instead. —] 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Does being tagged with "keep local" mean that a file can't be moved to Commons? Adding "keep local" seems to just be a request that a local copy be kept, not that the file not be moved to Commons, right? A local file that has the same name as a Commons file will be used on Misplaced Pages (it shadows out the Commons file), but the Commons file can still be used by other WMF projects, right? I'm not suggesting the IP was correct in removing the "Keep local" template, but wondering whether the restored files could still be tagged for a move to Commons. -- ] (]) 00:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{tl|Keep local}} is a request that a file not be moved to Commons - a move, by definition, means that it won't be in the original place anymore. It can still be ''copied'' to Commons. There's a {{tl|copy to Commons}} template specifically for that, though it wouldn't have surprised me if there hadn't been. —] 01:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::My bad. I meant "copy" to Commons, but thanks for clarifying. -- ] (]) 02:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * This reminds me of a similar problematic IP edit which I spotted in October, see ]. Did the other IP tag any keep local files which have been deleted? --] (]) 14:43, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *:No; their only deleted edits were to ], a scaled-down version of ] that was tagged as non-free. —] 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == BOOM Buster Deletion == | |||
| I'm the creator of the '']'' draft. I noticed that you stated that it wasn't confirmed that I made the request for the draft's deletion, so I intend to fix that. I've been meaning to talk to an administrator to delete the draft. ] (]) 01:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf == | |||
| Hi Explicit. You just deleted "File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf" per ], but it was shadowing ] uploaded by the same uploader under the same name. The Commons file was actually uploaded after the local file started being discussed at ] and concerns were raised about its licensing, but under a different license. Since you're also a Commons admin, perhaps you could advise on the best way to deal with the Commons file. ]? ]? -- ] (]) 11:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, thanks for pointing that out. I missed that the file was also on Commons. I've tagged it for lacking permission. ]] 11:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for taking a look at this. FWIW, I didn't notice it myself until after the local file had been deleted. -- ] (]) 21:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Michael Ruetz (1).jpg == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at ]? It looks like the source for the image might be some kind of German commercial photo/press agency based on , but I'm not sure. -- ] (]) 07:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, I tracked down the , where they cite "dpa/A3818 Klaus-Dietmar Gabbert" as the source. I can't determine if either of them are photo agencies. I did a quick spot check of other articles on the website and they use a mix of images from photo agencies and other sources. ]] 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for doing that. Do you think this is OK then per F7? -- ] (]) 00:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} This would still technically violate ]. While ] doesn't mention this directly (it really should), there is an implicit consensus that the recent death of an individual does not automatically grant a waiver for the replaceability aspect of policy. ]] 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Yes, it's implicitly assumed by many that the moment someone dies doesn't mean ] it met; a reasonable attempt still is expected to be made t find a free equivalent. Of course, just as many assume otherwise which is why you'll find non-free images sometimes being uploaded the same day some dies. There have numerous discussions about this at ], but they mostly end up getting nowhere because nobody can agree on the meaning of "reasonable attempt" or whether such an attempt is even necessary, and there are different ideas as to whether a bright-line time period after death should be specified or what it should be if one is specified. So, things are sort of stuck with the status quo where such images need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. For many, the default is a non-free is OK in such cases until a free equivalent shows up regardless, even if there are F7b issues involved. Many, after all, still think "WP:NFC = fair use" and use the terms interchangeably even though that doesn't seem to have ever been intended to be the case or at least not the case since WP:NFCC became policy. -- ] (]) 05:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == C-SPAN screenshots == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Do you think there's any point in discussing ] at FFD or can they be tagged for speedy deletion per F3, F9 or F11? I don't see any way to convert their licensing to non-free per F7 and discussing such a thing is unlikely to change that. I'm sure they were uploaded in good faith, but they're not "PD-USGov" eligible works. -- ] (]) 01:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply to|Marchjuly}} Hi, the noncommercial disclaimer is a textbook violates of F3, so I have deleted them as such. ]] 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for looking at these. -- ] (]) 04:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == F3 again == | |||
| Hi Explicit. Would you mind watching ]. These file's most likely qualify for speedy deletion per F3, but I figured I give the uploader a chance to sort things out. If there's no response within a day or so, or they respond negatively, perhaps the files should be deleted per F3. -- ] (]) 07:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok== | ==DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok== | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 12 December 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok
On 6 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kang Ju-hyeok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kang Ju-hyeok (pictured) became the youngest player in FC Seoul's history at the age of 17 years, 9 months, and 6 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kang Ju-hyeok. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kang Ju-hyeok), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Arambegama
I saw your edit on Arambegama (as it is still listed as having dab pages), but it appears to have no content after your edit - should it be deleted?— Rod 21:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Rodw:
Done. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Kassia St. Clair
Could I please have a copy of Kassia St. Clair (which you deleted), as I had only recently added a photo to it. Edwardx (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Edwardx: Here's a copy. There isn't much content. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Invicta Old Logo.gif
Why is File:Invicta Old Logo.gif deleted? I have already altered the non-free use rationale to comply with the guidelines? Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Marcnut1996: I have restored the image. If Iruka13 wishes to pursue it further, they should go to WP:FFD. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg
Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg? It was uploaded without a copyright license or any real source information, but the EXIF data indicates it might be Getty Images stock photo. I tried searching for the image and found it here on Getty page in Korean, but I can't find how the file's being licensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- https://www.istockphoto.com/en/%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84/%EB%B4%84-%EB%A0%88-%EB%A9%94%EC%8B%9C%EC%99%B8%EB%A5%B4-%EC%9E%88%EB%8A%94-%EC%A3%BC%EB%9D%BC-gm178824413-25187314 —Cryptic 09:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that Cryptic. I thought the file might be eligible for speedy deletion per F9, but you deleting the file for that reason takes care of that too. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Cryptic and Explicit: File:Luigi Mangione Smiling Github Profile Photo.jpeg is another one uploaded (by a different uploader though) that has no copyright license and is sourced to some kind of social media site. I explained the issue (at least what I perceive to be the issue) with this file to the uploader on their user talk page, but they haven't responded yet. FWIW, I'm not seeing any way for Misplaced Pages to keep this absent an acceptable free license or VRT verification since I don't think it can be converted to non-free. I suggested to the uploader that they tag the file for speedy deletion per G7, but this probably also meets F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Github isn't exactly social-media, but it is user-generated content. I'm less comfortable deleting those as F9s, since there's usually some chance the author's contactable and amenable to freely licensing the image. If it's the same person that Luigi Mangione is redirecting to, that's, um, probably not going to happen here. Definitely not usable as nonfree either way. I'd let it wait out the week to be deleted as an F4 for not having a known license. —Cryptic 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking a look at this Cryptic. Although your approach seems reasonable to me, another user has tagged the file for speedy deletion per F9, and I'm not sure I should remove the tag at this point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Github isn't exactly social-media, but it is user-generated content. I'm less comfortable deleting those as F9s, since there's usually some chance the author's contactable and amenable to freely licensing the image. If it's the same person that Luigi Mangione is redirecting to, that's, um, probably not going to happen here. Definitely not usable as nonfree either way. I'd let it wait out the week to be deleted as an F4 for not having a known license. —Cryptic 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
