| Revision as of 09:57, 14 December 2024 editJclemens (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,438 edits →Cartoys: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2024 edit undoCryptic (talk | contribs)Administrators41,603 editsm →Cartoys: not a fileNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:drv2|page=<PAGE NAME>|xfd_page=<XFD PAGE NAME>|reason=<REASON>}} ~~~~ --> | ||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| :{{DRV links|Cartoys|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ |
:{{DRV links|Cartoys|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cartoys}} | ||
| This deletion discussion had minimal participation and the nomination did not fully follow the procedures in ]; there are articles in the , , and with significant coverage, not to mention a good number of ''Seattle Times'' articles in local archives. I believe this was a premature deletion and the article could be saved and improved. ''']]''' 00:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | This deletion discussion had minimal participation and the nomination did not fully follow the procedures in ]; there are articles in the , , and with significant coverage, not to mention a good number of ''Seattle Times'' articles in local archives. I believe this was a premature deletion and the article could be saved and improved. ''']]''' 00:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:35, 14 December 2024
< 2024 December 13 Deletion review archives: 2024 December 2024 December 15 >14 December 2024
Cartoys
This deletion discussion had minimal participation and the nomination did not fully follow the procedures in WP:BEFORE; there are articles in the Wall Street Journal, Puget Sound Business Journal, and Chicago Tribune with significant coverage, not to mention a good number of Seattle Times articles in local archives. I believe this was a premature deletion and the article could be saved and improved. SounderBruce 00:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse, there were two relists where no one weighed in. This was by no definition premature. Did you ask the deleting admin for a copy to improve in draft space? That would make sense if you believe you can improve it to where a G4 no longer applies. Star Mississippi 01:26, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Endorse - Correct interpretation of the consensus. No keep !votes were made in the discussion and the sources brought by the requestor here were not presented in the discussion. The nominator at AfD also does not show any indication of a failure in their BEFORE duties. The closer cannot be blamed for assuming that a third relist would have yielded similar results as the first two. Delete was the only option here. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 03:53, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Overturn, with my apologies I saw this, thought that it was absurd, and failed to say so at the time. I can only opine in so many deletion discussions, and mistakenly assumed that other editors would chime in, as this area is not a core interest of mine. I was wrong. The decision is wrong on the merits, no matter who participated and how, and if DRV isn't the right place to say that--what is? Jclemens (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Restore we now have sources. The Chicago Tribune one is solid. WSJ is light. The Puget Sound ones I can't see, but they look likely to be fine. Closer's close was okay, but now we have sources. Hobit (talk) 08:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Relist. The first relist never actually made it onto the log, so this was really only relisted once. Given the good-faith request above and the low participation, a second relist is reasonable; the sources are decent but not so good that I'd want to just overrule the AfD (especially since WP:NCORP is stricter). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'd be fine with a relist too. But I note that until and unless N is changed, a corporation can meet GNG or the appropriate SNG, CORP, to be notable. Jclemens (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)