| Revision as of 07:24, 11 December 2024 editVanderwaalforces (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers43,985 editsm Vanderwaalforces moved page Asialimmer/Italian Baroque architecture/MaximoVicente1912 Peer Review to User:Asialimmer/Italian Baroque architecture/MaximoVicente1912 Peer Review without leaving a redirect: Misplaced userspace content← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:05, 14 December 2024 edit undoJimfbleak (talk | contribs)Administrators174,840 edits +Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The content in the article is composed well and it is presented adequately. The article has history as it explains what led up to Italian Baroque architecture which provides context. The article also presents location that this style can be found in which is necessary. The content has added to the overall quality of the article. Some strengths that could be added to the content is a section that describes the effects that Italian Baroque Architecture had and how it can be observed today. The article is clear and concise as it can be easily understood. The content is backed up by reliable sources. The lead is does include the articles major sections. The article overall is strong as it is presented clearly, as well as neutral, and it is all relevant sources that are up to date. | The content in the article is composed well and it is presented adequately. The article has history as it explains what led up to Italian Baroque architecture which provides context. The article also presents location that this style can be found in which is necessary. The content has added to the overall quality of the article. Some strengths that could be added to the content is a section that describes the effects that Italian Baroque Architecture had and how it can be observed today. The article is clear and concise as it can be easily understood. The content is backed up by reliable sources. The lead is does include the articles major sections. The article overall is strong as it is presented clearly, as well as neutral, and it is all relevant sources that are up to date. | ||
| :Has no inline refs as required here, books lack publication dates, pages referenced for Pevsner possibly isbns. ''Britannia'' link doesn't work, and refs 8 and 9 have retrieval dates but are missing the links to the sites ] - ] 15:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:05, 14 December 2024
The content in the article is composed well and it is presented adequately. The article has history as it explains what led up to Italian Baroque architecture which provides context. The article also presents location that this style can be found in which is necessary. The content has added to the overall quality of the article. Some strengths that could be added to the content is a section that describes the effects that Italian Baroque Architecture had and how it can be observed today. The article is clear and concise as it can be easily understood. The content is backed up by reliable sources. The lead is does include the articles major sections. The article overall is strong as it is presented clearly, as well as neutral, and it is all relevant sources that are up to date.
- Has no inline refs as required here, books lack publication dates, pages referenced for Pevsner possibly isbns. Britannia link doesn't work, and refs 8 and 9 have retrieval dates but are missing the links to the sites Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)