La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024 editLethargilistic (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,823 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024 edit undoLethargilistic (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,823 edits added Category:Presentment Clause case law using HotCat Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:
	]		]
	]		]
			]

Revision as of 22:29, 15 December 2024

1899 United States Supreme Court case

La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 11, 1899
Full case name	La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States
Citations	175 U.S. 423 (more)
Holding
A law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.
Court membership
Chief Justice Melville Fuller Associate Justices John M. Harlan · Horace Gray David J. Brewer · Henry B. Brown George Shiras Jr. · Edward D. White Rufus W. Peckham · Joseph McKenna
Case opinion
Majority	Harlan, joined by unanimous
Gray, McKenna took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Presentment Clause

La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a law is not invalid when a president signs it during a Congressional recess, so long as it is signed within 10 days.

References

La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899).
Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Pocket Veto". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 353.

External links

Text of La Abra Silver Mining Company v. United States, 175 U.S. 423 (1899) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: