Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Mwijaku: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:20, 19 December 2024 editJohn B123 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers194,219 edits Mwijaku: d← Previous edit Revision as of 20:55, 19 December 2024 edit undo3L3V8D (talk | contribs)152 edits Mwijaku: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:


* '''Delete''' - No indication of notability. --] (]) 20:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC) * '''Delete''' - No indication of notability. --] (]) 20:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

:As the editor of this article, I have made improvements by adding additional information from sources that I believe are credible. Please review it to see if it is satisfactory and help me by correcting any mistakes. ] (]) 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:55, 19 December 2024

Mwijaku

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Mwijaku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After observing the article being too promotional (still is), I moved the it back to draft space hoping for improvement that would follow a regular review at AFC but the original editor moved it back direct to the mainspace also nowhere in the references show subject's (important claims) like date of birth or number of children they have, where did the editor get them? That's WP: PROMOTIONAL, WP:COIEDIT and tries to use wikipedia as WP:SOAPBOX.

No any notable work listed show subject's importance, just a bunch of gossip blogs. Just a reminder, Misplaced Pages isn't a gossip blog/newspaper WP:NOTGOSSIP.

Refs: Only The Citizen is a reliable source, the rest are blogs that cannot be trusted on WP:BLP. ANU 01:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

As the editor of this article, I have made improvements by adding additional information from sources that I believe are credible. Please review it to see if it is satisfactory and help me by correcting any mistakes. 3L3V8D (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: