| Revision as of 18:27, 20 December 2024 editPaleoFile (talk | contribs)37 edits →December 2024: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App talk reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:37, 20 December 2024 edit undoBowler the Carmine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,019 edits ONLY Warning: Edit warring (UV 0.1.6)Tag: UltravioletNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| ::The issue is that you used the summary {{tq|Fixed grammar}}, which does not accurately describe the changes you made. In the future, please accurately describe your changes so editors understand what you changed and why. ] | ] 15:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ::The issue is that you used the summary {{tq|Fixed grammar}}, which does not accurately describe the changes you made. In the future, please accurately describe your changes so editors understand what you changed and why. ] | ] 15:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::@] by the way who are you? something like developer? ] (]) 18:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | :::@] by the way who are you? something like developer? ] (]) 18:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] | ] 18:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:37, 20 December 2024
Welcome!
Hi PaleoFile! I noticed your contributions to Monquirasaurus and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Synorem (talk) 17:58, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Sachicasaurus has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Bowler the Carmine | talk 15:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bowler the Carmine someone keep changes mass of sachicasaurus to 15 tons. while its correct mass estimate was 17 tons which is estimated by Zhao in 2024 PaleoFile (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that you used the summary
Fixed grammar
, which does not accurately describe the changes you made. In the future, please accurately describe your changes so editors understand what you changed and why. Bowler the Carmine | talk 15:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC)- @Bowler the Carmine by the way who are you? something like developer? PaleoFile (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that you used the summary
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sachicasaurus. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bowler the Carmine | talk 18:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)