| Revision as of 01:48, 22 December 2024 editMoscow Connection (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers61,673 edits →3RR: addition← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:12, 22 December 2024 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,552,864 editsm Substing templates: {{3RR}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == 3RR == | == 3RR == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| {{3RR}} ] (]) 01:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 01:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Actually, I'd better warn you like this. I'm trying to expand the article (or at least to save all the sources I have found), and I don't want to be blocked for accidentally reverting your edits. --] (]) 01:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | Actually, I'd better warn you like this. I'm trying to expand the article (or at least to save all the sources I have found), and I don't want to be blocked for accidentally reverting your edits. --] (]) 01:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 22 December 2024
December 2024
Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sigma Boy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 01:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Sigma Boy
See Talk:Sigma Boy#Real name. --Moscow Connection (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moscow Connection (talk) 01:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Actually, I'd better warn you like this. I'm trying to expand the article (or at least to save all the sources I have found), and I don't want to be blocked for accidentally reverting your edits. --Moscow Connection (talk) 01:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)