| Revision as of 16:23, 30 November 2024 editSNUGGUMS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers120,754 edits Notice: Not using edit summary.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:13, 23 December 2024 edit undoSNUGGUMS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers120,754 edits Comment | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| ] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> ] (] / ]) 16:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | ] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> ] (] / ]) 16:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :You don't appear to have taken the above notice as seriously as you should have, and either way still aren't using edit summaries nearly enough. Please start implementing them as often as possible for your further contributions. It'll help others more easily understand your intentions when editing. This especially goes for major changes. ] (] / ]) 13:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 23 December 2024
Proposed deletion of Jacob Rott
Hello, Samilllll55.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I edit here too, under the username FuzzyMagma, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jacob Rott, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Your edit to Selena Gomez has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Misplaced Pages. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Misplaced Pages:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Jacob Rott
Hello Samilllll55., and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jacob Rott, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jacob Rott.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 20:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- You don't appear to have taken the above notice as seriously as you should have, and either way still aren't using edit summaries nearly enough. Please start implementing them as often as possible for your further contributions. It'll help others more easily understand your intentions when editing. This especially goes for major changes. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)