Misplaced Pages

User talk:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:06, 23 December 2024 editBowler the Carmine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,021 edits ONLY Warning: Edit warring (UV 0.1.6)Tag: Ultraviolet← Previous edit Revision as of 18:11, 23 December 2024 edit undo2601:40:ce00:1590:24f6:a73a:9f20:74c (talk) →December 2024: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been ]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 17:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC) ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been ]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 17:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

:I've given valid reasons. The conclusion by Grimes et al. are highly contentious. They either shouldn't be featured. Or if they are should be accompanies by those of Seyfried et al. ] (]) 18:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->


Revision as of 18:11, 23 December 2024

December 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm CipherRephic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Warburg effect (oncology) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CR (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

The citation to the article by DR Grimes et al. and their opinion on low carb diets is "not constructive." If you are going to get into the realm of opinion either this doesn't belong or it should be accompanies by the work of Seyfried et al. Unless I'm banned by Wiki, I plan on from time to time checking in and making editorial changes as I see fit. 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did at Warburg effect (oncology), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CR (talk) 17:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

I've given valid reasons. The conclusion by Grimes et al. are highly contentious. They either shouldn't be featured. Or if they are should be accompanies by those of Seyfried et al. 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Information icon Hi 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Warburg effect (oncology) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Warburg effect (oncology), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Bowler the Carmine | talk 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.