Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:21, 23 December 2024

Welcome!

Hi CipherRephic! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Edcolins (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

2024 United Kingdom general election infobox saga

Hi :)

I saw you reverted my edit on changing the infobox on the page 2024 United Kingdom general election with the reason "infobox: reverted change from TILE to TIE. to reiterate what the comment at the top says: "here is a consensus to use this infobox style, not Template:Infobox election... do NOT change the infobox without consulting the talk page to change the consensus." no such consultation has occured." I am no one to decide whether we use TILE to TIE. But I have to admit, I found your reasoning somewhat disrespectful. I have multiple times asked for arguments on the talk page for why we use TIE, and there's been a large lack of replies, so it's not true that I'm just chaging the infobox "without consulting". I know there is no consensus on using TILE, so I'm not going to go into any edit war before knowing whether a consensus for it can be reached. The only reason I added it, was because the previous infobox had been deleted, and I believed that an infobox was necessary, so I just added my own preferred version.

I inivite you to join the discussion on the talk page,Talk:2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#What_is_the_significance_of_seats_at_dissolution? so we can gather a better shared consensus on how to use the infobox, and prevent these potential editing wars.

Have a nice day :) @Thomediter Thomediter (talk) 00:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

@Thomediter Hi there,

Apologies if the edit summary came across as curt, I was just trying to get across the rationale as succinctly as possible. I'm well aware of the extensive discussions around the infobox, particularly on whether to put the seats at dissolution or at GE2019 (for reference, I'd favour seats at GE2019), my issue with switching TILE to TIE (even indirectly) was that there hasn't been a discussion specifically on that since late May that I can find, let alone one that found a consensus in favour of TIE - so, at least as far as I can tell, the consensus to use TILE from Talk:2024 United Kingdom general election#Infobox still stands.

Again, sorry if the reversion came across as snippy, and I hope this helps clarify.

CipherRephic (talk) 11:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

That's fair, it's all good. It was a small mess yesterday, with the infobox being removed and all, so maybe things just went through a bit too quick, by me too.

@Thomediter Thomediter (talk) 11:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

you revetede my edits

you can not revert my edits 73.189.125.13 (talk) 15:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Rollback

I presume that you intended to undo my last edit, which inserted a MOS violation, than all of my edits? I worked on that assumption and fixed the MOS violation. Upd Edit (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

@Upd Edit Yep, sorry about that. I think it must've been done automatically by RedWarn with the AGF button when I was trying to revert the one edit. CR (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Nice userpage!

Hey, I don't know where to put this, I just wanted to say that I really like your userpage. Have a nice day! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 22:01, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! You too :) CR (talk) 22:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Mossbourne Community Academy

Hi,

The edit was deliberate. The section removed is an unfounded and partisan edit made by people attempting to attack this institution 62.3.64.157 (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

The section is supported by reliable sources. Misplaced Pages has a duty to reflect these sources - if new sources come out, the section will be changed to reflect that. At the moment it is both apparent and notable that such allegations have been raised, and it is therefore necessary to include these. CR (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Warburg effect (oncology). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bowler the Carmine | talk 18:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

@Bowler the Carmine Sorry if my edits on the topic came across as editwarry, I felt the edits by the IP reasonably constituted vandalism given their persistent blanking of sections relevant to the article. I'm no oncologist, so I'll be steering well clear of that article as it's clearly someone else's minefield to clear up. CR (talk) 18:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)