Misplaced Pages

Talk:West Bank: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:20, 23 December 2024 edit2601:447:cf7f:1578:a92c:cd73:ea5f:b9bd (talk) Palestinian flag: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 23 December 2024 edit undoSelfstudier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers41,194 edits Palestinian flag: WP:ARBECR, not an edit requestNext edit →
Line 52: Line 52:
::::Fair points. I'll leave this here however: ''{{tq|]}}''. ::::Fair points. I'll leave this here however: ''{{tq|]}}''.
::::Anything that gives an impression of partiality should be avoided imo. ] (]) 09:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC) ::::Anything that gives an impression of partiality should be avoided imo. ] (]) 09:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
::::: ] ] (]) 18:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Readers may not be, but writers certainly are. Readers are smart enough to realize from the flag that the article is biased and will dismiss everything in it for that reason. For this reason, I support keeping the flag. But you presumably should be opposed to it, for the reason that propaganda is more effective when it's not obviously propaganda. I suppose it is a blessing that Misplaced Pages editors and/or terrorism enthusiasts lack basic common sense. ] (]) 18:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== Maʽarávit == == Maʽarávit ==

Revision as of 18:23, 23 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Bank article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 4 months 
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPalestine Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIsrael Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWestern Asia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGeography Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!


Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7


This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Israeli POV

While we should indeed mention the Israeli narrative, things have changed a bit with the 2024 ICJ ruling. Essentially the court has ruled that all these reasons for holding on to the West Bank are without any legal foundation. Before, this was subject of debate but that debate is over for all practical purposes so it needs to be clarified somehow. Selfstudier (talk) 14:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Add the Hebrew name of this area please "Judea and Samaria"

It is missing, and it very important part about this area 147.235.196.127 (talk) 19:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Not done. See WP:WESTBANK. Selfstudier (talk) 20:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
WP:WESTBANK addresses terms for the West Bank in English. I believe that the WP:COMMONNAME in Hebrew is "יְהוּדָה וְשׁוֹמְרוֹן" ("Judea and Samaria"), as reflected in both Misplaced Pages and Wikidata. (Yes, the calque "West Bank" exists in Hebrew, as pointed out in WP:ARBPIA2 but, from what I've read, in Hebrew that's the one viewed as having a (Jordan-centric) POV.) Assuming some would object to "יְהוּדָה וְשׁוֹמְרוֹן", a possible compromise is to use "אֵזוֹר יְהוּדָה וְשׁוֹמְרוֹן" ("Judea and Samaria Area")—see WP:WESTBANK rule #5. Dotyoyo (talk) 08:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
This is English Misplaced Pages. No end run around WP:WESTBANK by way of a different language. Selfstudier (talk) 10:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Legality of occupation

@BarrelProof: : Top UN court says Israeli occupation of West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal Makeandtoss (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

The BBC source does actually make it clear that the occupation is illegal, so I don't understand that part of the edit summary but there is a problem with "since 1967", at the outset, the occupation itself would not have been illegal but became so with the passage of time (no intent to leave and all the other reasons given in the AO). That part needs fixing up. Selfstudier (talk) 08:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure what part of the edit summary you're referring to, but I agree with you. The sentence in the Misplaced Pages article that I changed said the occupation has been illegal since 1967. The cited source does not say that and the ICJ did not declare that (AFAIK). My edit converted a false statement into a true statement. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
@Selfstudier: I don't think we need attribution for the ICJ, top authority on international law, in the opening paragraph. A good middle ground would be ".., whose continuation is illegal under international law." Makeandtoss (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
I don't mind either way, for me the point is that issue is finally resolved because it is the ICJ. At some point, sources may simply report the illegality as a fact without referring to to the ICJ, do we have any of those yet? Selfstudier (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
@Selfstudier: It was reaffirmed in addition to having been resolved, as RS have long described the occupation as having become illegal. Yes, we have at least one: : "In fact, the US moved its embassy to West Jerusalem, despite Israel’s continued illegal occupation of the eastern half of the city, in 2018." Makeandtoss (talk) 11:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Although RS have long described the occupation as illegal and that was a significant view, there were dissenting views. Agreed that no longer matters, just that I would prefer but do not insist on, because it will likely take a little time to sink in, more RS just straight up saying it. One is however sufficient so if you want to do away with the attribution I won't object. Selfstudier (talk) 11:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
I have removed the attribution. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Palestinian flag

Doesn't its inclusion here violate WP:NPOV? Shoshin000 (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

How? Selfstudier (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
It's a disputed area, and the State of Palestine is a partially recognized state.
Kashmir for example does not have a huge Pakistani or Indian flag on its page, as it would give an impression of partiality to a reader, thereby undermining the absorption of information. Shoshin000 (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Readers are not stupid children. It most certainly does not violate NPOV. Israel does not claim it is part of Israel, it is administered as occupied territory. It is part of the State of Palestine. Israel is also a partially recognized state and a disputed area for some people. That has nothing to do with it. Sean.hoyland (talk) 09:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Fair points. I'll leave this here however: According to a 2020 report by Gallup based on data from the U.S. Department of Education, 54% of adults in the United States lack English literacy proficiency.
Anything that gives an impression of partiality should be avoided imo. Shoshin000 (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
WP:FORUM Selfstudier (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Maʽarávit

who says "Maʽarávit"? It's Maʽaravít. 2600:8800:2C09:3200:A5F7:4504:20BC:DAB8 (talk) 16:56, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Edit

@Nableezy: I think you had mistakenly reverted my edit while reverting the sock. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: