| Revision as of 15:55, 24 December 2024 editDmitry Bobriakov (talk | contribs)106 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:55, 24 December 2024 edit undoNickCT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,922 edits →Appin (company): ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Keep''' - As article creator; company clearly meets ]. If nom has ] or ] concerns, could those get discussed on the talk page '''before''' going to AfD? If there are ] or ] issues on an article for a notable subject, the remedy is to address the issues on the page, not delete. ] (]) 15:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - As article creator; company clearly meets ]. If nom has ] or ] concerns, could those get discussed on the talk page '''before''' going to AfD? If there are ] or ] issues on an article for a notable subject, the remedy is to address the issues on the page, not delete. ] (]) 15:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *:The article's contribution history demonstrates that this article cannot be remedy, because a string of possible ] editors update the article against these policies. Obviously, meets ] but this is not enough for the article to be kept. Because this article does not describe the company and (only controversies and legal acts). ] (]) 15:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | *:The article's contribution history demonstrates that this article cannot be remedy, because a string of possible ] editors update the article against these policies. Obviously, meets ] but this is not enough for the article to be kept. Because this article does not describe the company and (only controversies and legal acts). ] (]) 15:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *::Which editors percisely are you calling possible ]s? Regardless, even if you're right, can't we just remove whatever content they've added? ] (]) 15:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:55, 24 December 2024
Appin (company)
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Appin (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appin closed in 2013. The article is facing a string of changes where there may be a WP:SOCK (see latest changes). Delete according to WP:ATTACK which summarizes that the article has a denigrating purpose, rather than an informational one. WP:NPOV and WP:LBL, because the article is only about calmony even if it is quoted by notable media sources. Dmitry Bobriakov (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dmitry Bobriakov (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I verified that the first deletion was met with a string of blocks, which is why decided to send an initial message to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org, following which agreed to initiate these discussions directly.--Dmitry Bobriakov (talk) 15:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - As article creator; company clearly meets WP:GNG. If nom has WP:ATTACK or WP:NPOV concerns, could those get discussed on the talk page before going to AfD? If there are WP:ATTACK or WP:NPOV issues on an article for a notable subject, the remedy is to address the issues on the page, not delete. NickCT (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article's contribution history demonstrates that this article cannot be remedy, because a string of possible WP:SOCK editors update the article against these policies. Obviously, meets WP:GNG but this is not enough for the article to be kept. Because this article does not describe the company and (only controversies and legal acts). Dmitry Bobriakov (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Which editors percisely are you calling possible WP:SOCKs? Regardless, even if you're right, can't we just remove whatever content they've added? NickCT (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article's contribution history demonstrates that this article cannot be remedy, because a string of possible WP:SOCK editors update the article against these policies. Obviously, meets WP:GNG but this is not enough for the article to be kept. Because this article does not describe the company and (only controversies and legal acts). Dmitry Bobriakov (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)