Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:08, 24 December 2024 editDavidmanheim (talk | contribs)217 edits Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 18:16, 24 December 2024 edit undoButterscotch Beluga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,121 edits Undid revision 1264996223 by Davidmanheim (talk) Removing comment by non-extended confirmed user - Again, please limit your participation in WP:PIA to edit requests only until extended confirmedTag: UndoNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
*:{{re|Butterscotch Beluga}} What about merging with ]? <span class="nowrap">] (]) <small>(please ] me on reply)</small></span> 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC) *:{{re|Butterscotch Beluga}} What about merging with ]? <span class="nowrap">] (]) <small>(please ] me on reply)</small></span> 01:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::That'd actually be better. I had originally proposed ] because I thought it was also being merged with ], but I now see that proposal isn't gaining traction. ] (]) 01:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC) *::That'd actually be better. I had originally proposed ] because I thought it was also being merged with ], but I now see that proposal isn't gaining traction. ] (]) 01:54, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::That article is about the Muslim conquests, and ends a half dozen centuries before most of what this article covers, so it seems a bit of a stretch. ] (]) 15:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' to ]. There was nothing special about Palestine in the Ottoman period as far as Muslim population movements were concerned. The I-P conflict is the ''only'' reason for the focus on Palestine, and that focus creates the misleading impression that Palestine was special when it wasn't. This article also fails to give a balanced account as there is no attempt to place migrations in context or weigh their significance relative to the existing population. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC) * '''Merge''' to ]. There was nothing special about Palestine in the Ottoman period as far as Muslim population movements were concerned. The I-P conflict is the ''only'' reason for the focus on Palestine, and that focus creates the misleading impression that Palestine was special when it wasn't. This article also fails to give a balanced account as there is no attempt to place migrations in context or weigh their significance relative to the existing population. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
* '''Merge''' The content could be suitably added to ] or ]. ] (]) 17:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC) * '''Merge''' The content could be suitably added to ] or ]. ] (]) 17:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:16, 24 December 2024

Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Muslim migrations to Ottoman Palestine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article started by Icewhiz sock. Article is taken straight from Zionist propaganda: Palestinians are "recent" immigrants to Israel/Palestine, when Jewish immigration was far larger Huldra (talk) 23:53, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep if there is a POV bias in this page, that should be resolved by editing. If the topic is notable, which it appears to be, that wouldn't be a valid deletion rationale. Has sources, and ineligible for G5 since other contributions were made after the sock. Andre🚐 00:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep. "Article is Zionist propaganda" is not a valid deletion argument. Specifically, according to WP:SKCRIT, this is a nomination that is clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 00:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
While I agree their wording is unnecessarily combative, WP:G5 is still a valid reason to bring this here & I'm unsure how it could be considered an "attempt to end an editing dispute." Who is the editing dispute between? Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
@Butterscotch Beluga: As Andre said, the page has substantial edits from one other person and doesn't qualify for G5. The editing dispute is that Huldra is unhappy with the article's content. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 01:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: