| Revision as of 23:40, 24 December 2024 editAbishe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,851 edits →Happy Holidays: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:38, 26 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:KylieTastic/Archive 2024) (bot | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| {{archives|auto=no|list={{center|{{Yearly archive list|root=User talk:KylieTastic|prefix=Archive }}}}|search=yes|age=7}} | {{archives|auto=no|list={{center|{{Yearly archive list|root=User talk:KylieTastic|prefix=Archive }}}}|search=yes|age=7}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config|algo=old(7d)|archive=User talk:KylieTastic/Archive %(year)d|minthreadsleft=0|minthreadstoarchive=1}} | {{User:MiszaBot/config|algo=old(7d)|archive=User talk:KylieTastic/Archive %(year)d|minthreadsleft=0|minthreadstoarchive=1}} | ||
| == draft submission Draft:NNC2215 == | |||
| Why does it need secondary source? It is from a reviewed paper. Also, its just a stub for the new drug. I honestly don't understand why is the original review paper not sufficient. ] (]) 11:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi ], it was not myself that did the more recent review but I'll try to explain. Basically it's because that is what the current ] require. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia of "notable" subjects not a general publishing platform, where it has been declined by consensus that being "notable" means having multiple non trivial independent sources in most cases. Being published in Nature is a good start but another couple of sources will help show notability. However at the moment probably all reporting will be based on the single original source so some may still challenge. Ideally subjects like this would have secondary studies to back them up, but it's probably going to be some time for those. Another option until more sources are available is to incorporate it into ] and/or ]. Regards ] (]) 12:19, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tps}} Hi ]. I'd like to add that primary literature is typically not considered reliable on Misplaced Pages for biomedical information, see ]. This is because primary literature is often exploratory and do not reflect firm findings, and the results have not been, e.g., replicated by other groups. It is frequently the case that primary research findings need to be further interpreted and evaluated to determine, for example, how much stock to put in them, which Misplaced Pages editors are not supposed to do except in very limited cases. Best of luck. ] (] • ]) 12:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Holidays! == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">]]]{{Center|]}} | |||
| '''Hello KylieTastic:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, ] ] 17:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ]{{paragraph break}} | |||
| </div> | |||
| <div style="padding-left: 2em; margin-top: 1em; font-size: 88%; font-style: italic">Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings}} to send this message</div>{{-}} | |||
| ==Thanks!!!== | |||
| Thanks for all your great contributions to Misplaced Pages and for all your help. Happy Holidays and New Year!!! ] (]) 19:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Further Guidance on Article Submission == | == Request for Further Guidance on Article Submission == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:38, 26 December 2024
|
If you have a general question it may be quicker to ask at the Misplaced Pages:Teahouse or Click this to start a New Question here |
|
AfC Drafts NOTE: To be fair to all submitters I do not review/re-review on request, I just pick new and old submissions at random... Current Backlog: 1,803 pending submissions |
 Archives |
| 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Request for Further Guidance on Article Submission
Dear KylieTastic, Thank you for your review of my article submission. I appreciate your feedback regarding the references and the notability of the subject. I would like to improve the article and ensure it meets the notability criteria for Misplaced Pages. Could you please guide me on the following: What specific types of references would be considered more appropriate or substantial to establish notability? Are there any specific sources or kinds of coverage (e.g., academic publications, in-depth media articles) that would be more helpful? If additional references are necessary, how can I best demonstrate the subject’s significance in independent, reliable secondary sources? For your reference, here is the draft link: Draft:Toula_Gordillo I’m committed to improving the article and would appreciate any further advice you can provide to help me meet the guidelines for resubmission. Thank you for your time and assistance. SyedTayyab560 (talk) 19:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi SyedTayyab560, most of the sources are primary, i.e. by the subject or closely related. All new articles on Misplaced Pages have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). So you need to look for independent sources that talk about the subject or the subjects work. Also you can't have a source that says "Courier-Mail Archives" with no details to a date/page/title etc so someone can locate the source. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Kylie,
- Thank you for your helpful feedback regarding the draft. I understand that the sources I have used so far are primarily from the subject or closely related to the subject, and I will work on finding more independent, reliable secondary sources that meet Misplaced Pages's notability and significant coverage guidelines.
- Regarding the "Courier-Mail Archives" source, I will ensure that I provide the necessary details (date, page, title, etc.) so it can be properly located.
- If you have any specific suggestions for where I might find more suitable sources or if there are any types of publications that are particularly valuable for establishing notability, I would greatly appreciate your advice.
- Thank you again for your time and assistance. SyedTayyab560 (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Article Decline
What resources should I use I thought the funeral home one on Joseph A. Burgundy was fine but what else should I use? Doodledoo4 (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fake source KylieTastic (talk) 21:58, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
btw
KylieTastic... would you mind leaving me one(as it would be awkward to have self awarded myself...I did not), thanks and Merry Christmas, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- I wish you had not asked as it makes if feel somewhat awkward, but I had already had the intention to do so as I realised you were on the list so I have just done what I intended to do anyway. Also thank you for thinking to thank others and give some positive feedback (something often missing on here). Happy holidays and on to 2025.... Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Top AfC Editor
|
The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor | |
| In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
Request on 17:51:47, 23 December 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by MarcosNogas
- MarcosNogas (talk · contribs)
What can I do about this if there is only ONE source for the information about this list, and this source is cited on the article.
I spent days looking for it.
Or, at least, where could I publish this list?
MarcosNogas (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi MarcosNogas, all new articles on Misplaced Pages have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). So if the only source is google themselves and no one else then it will not meet the guidelines for inclusion on English Misplaced Pages. As for where else you could publish, sorry I have ideas for others sites that would be suitable. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Revoke TPA Joeypike2021
I don't really feel like edit warring trying to help with the removal of the disruption, and I had to do it twice. Can you revoke @Joeypike2021's tpa access because I am tired as heck and I have a flight tomorrow. Thanks in advance. DACartman (talk) 21:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
I now see that @Bbb23 has done it, and would like to thank him, and also apologize to you for wasting your time. Have a good night.DACartman (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @DACartman, I would have done if I was an admin but I'm not, no worries anyway your not wasting my time trying to shutdown idiots. Have a good flight and a good holidays. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025! |
|
Hello KylieTastic, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |