| Revision as of 22:47, 26 December 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators30,237 edits →Good article reassessment for British Library: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 27 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,307,002 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom/Archive 17) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive=3 | |minthreadstoarchive=3 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == FYI - a merge proposal == | |||
| There's an open merge proposal at ] that UK politics watchers might be interested in. -- ] (]). 09:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 15:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | == Nomination of ] for deletion == | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 27 December 2024
|
_(Tudor_Crown).svg) |
| Primary article | Categories · Featured content · Templates |
| This is the talk page for WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Shortcut
| |||
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 | |||
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Nomination of Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Source applicability & spectrum position on Conservative Party (UK
Cambial Yellowing and I are in dispute about the applicability of three – or four – sources being used to describe the position of the Conservative Party on the left-right spectrum. Outside opinion would be helpful in breaking the impasse. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
FYI - Call a General Election has been nominated for deletion
The Call a General Election article about the Parliament petition of that name has been nominated for deletion. For anyone interested, the discussion is here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Call a General Election. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Honours lists
Draft:2025 New Year Honours and 2024 Political Peerages need some help. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for British Library
British Library has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2024 (UTC)