Revision as of 18:24, 17 December 2024 editSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,357 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (High) (Rater)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:14, 28 December 2024 edit undoNXcrypto (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,046 edits →Not AllNext edit → | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. ] (]) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. ] (]) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
==Edits== | |||
{{Ping|Nomian}} Do you have any sources to dispute the content you are so far? Just citing the lack of existence of a talk page discussion is not enough. See ]. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:14, 28 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Meat-puppetry notice
User:Wiki.arfazhxss has been recruiting editors on Reddit to edit this and other related articles as well as influence discussions and consensus building on the talk pages. Reddit link: . In case, the page is deleted, here is an arhcive: . LucrativeOffer (talk) 07:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
EDIT: Restored this notice again after it was removed by a vandal IP. There has been a series of Reddit threads posted by u/nerdiste (A.K.A User:Wiki.arfazhxss) to swing the consensus in favor of changing "Bengali Hindu" to "Bengali" in the lead. Links: , , . LucrativeOffer (talk) 04:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Repetition of Paragraph
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first paragraph of the International Reactions header is repeated twice. Zargham Ali (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done--❯❯❯Pravega 16:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Not All
Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Edits
@Nomian: Do you have any sources to dispute the content you are reverting so far? Just citing the lack of existence of a talk page discussion is not enough. See WP:STONEWALL. Nxcrypto Message 00:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- C-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- C-Class Bangladesh articles
- Mid-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- C-Class Pakistan articles
- Mid-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistani history articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors