| Revision as of 15:38, 28 December 2024 edit2409:40c1:5e:ba34:8000:: (talk) →Won't bother you again: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 28 December 2024 edit undoRavensfire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers88,626 edits Reverting edit(s) by 2409:40C1:5E:BA34:8000:0:0:0 (talk) to rev. 1265609886 by Lowercase sigmabot III: Vandalism (UV 0.1.6)Tags: Ultraviolet UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | : Thank you {{U|Jannatulbaqi}}. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Won't bother you again == | |||
| I didn’t know the extent of delusion you carry. It made me realize I am just wasting my time even conversing with you. You are much more flawed than I first thought you were. Nothing is hidden from me—not even your forced attempts to seem neutral in your edits. You can’t even stand up for your own namesake, which you’ve been using for God knows how many years when it was being distorted. I had to. Mr. Avatar, lol. | |||
| And one more thing: every time some narcissistic editor threatens me with admins when I am just having a non-abusive, normal conversation with them without even disrupting the article, I know I’ve broken them from the inside. You can say it’s because of my aspersions or other things, but we both know what actually bothered you. If I wanted to destroy your reputation, no power in this world could stop me. But that was never my intent. It’s also not that hard to do a bit of self-introspection from time to time. Easy for an avatar. | |||
| And don’t worry, I will never waste my time on you anymore. How can I even argue with a god who is perfect in every way possible? What a waste of time and energy. I was wrong about you. It tells me how flawed I am myself. ] (]) 15:38, 28 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:50, 28 December 2024
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
On Sanskrit inscriptions in a mosque
You might like this. Upd Edit (talk) 16:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Kautilya
I ginally understand, I think, why you use the name "Kautilya." I always wondered why you would use a reference to a 'prime minister' of Chandragupta, but it's a reference to encyclopedic collecting and compiling information. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| When you see an unnecessary block, you defend the affected user. When you see a need for help, you provide advice. You discuss edits with newer editors, explain possible issues with them and implement changes after highly constructive discussion. You do these things in your free time for other volunteers and the encyclopedia. I'm not sure if "random" is the right term, but these are acts of kindness you deserve a barnstar for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Wow! Thank you ToBeFree. I am blushing... :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox US political party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Ophiophagus hannah Cobra (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request for Audrey truschke
Hi! I am proposing a new edit request for Audrey truschke. This edit will include an author named girish shahane who issued a critique of her work on aurangzeb. This seems like a legitimate edit since the review was published in a reputable indian news outlet called scroll in.
I really don't see why this can't be used as a valid critique even if the critique isn't is a historian. I'm just wondering why criticism has to come from only a historian for it to be valid. Can it not come from a reputable news outlet? Hope to hear from you thanks............... Ker3243 (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Academic works get academic reviews, published in journals. They get a lot higher weightage than those published in news outlets. History is a very ancient subject dating back to Herodotus and Aristotle. There is a long tradition of how to assess historical data, which scholarly historians follow. Popular historians know nothing about it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
- Thank you Fowler&fowler. What a lovely greeting! Happy holidays for you too! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
|
Happy holidays! |
| Wishing you a Merry Christmas filled with love and joy, a Happy Holiday season surrounded by warmth and laughter, and a New Year brimming with hope, happiness, and success! 🎄🎉✨ Baqi:) (talk) 10:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Thank you Jannatulbaqi. Happy holidays to you too! Let us hope that 2025 will be better than this year has been! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)